The Baofeng UV-25 is the clear winner here. It outperforms the RT95 in nearly every measurable category while costing less than half the price.
The single most important differentiator is the overall score gap. The UV-25's 76/100 rating significantly exceeds the RT95's 53/100, reflecting superior performance across the board. Beyond that, the UV-25's confirmed 10W transmission power and built-in GPS give it practical advantages the RT95 lacks, while both radios support CHIRP programming.
The UV-25 is ideal for budget-conscious operators who want solid performance and navigation capability without breaking the bank. The RT95 might appeal only to someone with very specific use case requirements not reflected in these specs, though the data doesn't make a compelling case for it.
We recommend the Baofeng UV-25. At $50 with a higher overall score, GPS functionality, and confirmed power output, it delivers better value and capabilities. Unless you have a particular reason to prefer the RT95, the UV-25 is the smarter choice for most amateur radio operators.
By use case
Beginner needing basic dual-band coverage
Its dual-band capability and lower cost make it ideal for initial learning.
Intermediate operator needing APRS and GPS
The built-in GPS and superior feature set support advanced field operations.
Budget-conscious user prioritizing basic function
The lower price point offers sufficient functionality for entry-level experimentation.
Advanced field operator requiring high features
Its extensive memory and advanced features support complex, dedicated operations.
Operator needing a reliable backup radio
The UV-25's robust feature set makes it a reliable secondary communication tool.
Made your choice?
Baofeng UV-25PICK
$51.99 on AmazonRetevis RT95
$123.49 on Amazon