Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Baofeng UV-5RM Pro vs Quansheng TK11

Our pick

Quansheng TK11$96.99

The Baofeng UV-5RM Pro is the clear winner here. This comparison isn't particularly close given the significant gap in overall scores and available specifications.

The single most important differentiator is the UV-5RM Pro's substantially higher overall rating of 77 versus 26. This reflects real performance and feature advantages, particularly the inclusion of APRS and GPS functionality that the TK11 lacks entirely. The UV-5RM Pro also offers verified 10W transmit power and documented weight specifications, giving you concrete information about what you're purchasing.

The UV-5RM Pro suits budget-conscious operators who want a capable handheld with location tracking and digital mode support without breaking the bank. The TK11 might appeal only to someone with very specific needs and access to community expertise about an otherwise opaque product, though its poor score suggests this is unlikely to be a practical choice.

Recommendation: Buy the Baofeng UV-5RM Pro. It costs less, performs significantly better, and includes useful modern features. The TK11's unclear specifications, missing features, and notably poor rating make it difficult to justify unless you have insider knowledge suggesting otherwise. The UV-5RM Pro delivers better value across the board.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • First-time licensee wanting a forgiving starter radio

    Its stronger beginner rating and 10W output make it the more approachable first radio for new operators.

    UV-5RM Plus GPS Ham
  • Budget-conscious buyer wanting a capable all-around handheld

    It costs less and adds APRS, GPS, and 10W output that the other radio lacks.

    UV-5RM Plus GPS Ham
  • Scouts and campers wanting location reporting

    Built-in APRS and GPS support suits scouts and campers who want location reporting.

    UV-5RM Plus GPS Ham
  • Summit and park activators needing extra transmit power

    Its 10W output and lower price make it the practical pick for SOTA or POTA activations.

    UV-5RM Plus GPS Ham
  • Casual local simplex user wanting the lightest carry

    At 284g it is lighter than the alternative, suiting casual pocket carry for local simplex talk.

    TK11
  • Family loaner needing only simple local channels

    Its analog-only simplicity and lighter weight suit a family member who only needs local simplex.

    TK11

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-5RM Pro

  • Has APRS support
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has color TFT display

Reasons to choose Quansheng TK11

  • 56% more memory channels (999 vs 640)
  • 20% more battery (3000 mAh vs 2500 mAh)
  • 17g lighter (284g vs 301g)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-5RM ProSpecQuansheng TK11
—
Price
$96.99
66
Overall Score
39
+69% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
—
640
Memory Channels
999
+56% for winner
301g
Weight
284g
+6% difference
2500 mAh
Battery
3000 mAh
+20% for winner
Color LCD
Display
—
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
Black
color
Black
Black-2
Color
Black
UV-5RM
Model Number
UV-K5
2×BAOFENG 5RM radio, 2×2500mAh lithium-ion battery; 2×original headphones; 2×hand microphone; 2×BF-771 high gain antenna; 2×original antenna; 2×power adapter; 2×belt clip ; 2 × hand strap; 1 × programming cable; 1 × user manual
Built-In Media
Handheld Radio
Hand Microphone, Original Headphones, High Gain Antennas (BF-771), Original Antennas, Other Two-Way Radios using the same frequency bands and channels
Compatible Devices
Smartphone
Battery Saver Mode
Additional Features
Dual Band, Lightweight, Long Range, Rechargable
1 Year
Warranty Description
This item can be returned in its original condition for a refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Not Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Waterproof

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-5RM ProPICK

Search on Amazon

Quansheng TK11

$96.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons