Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Jul 2026

Baofeng DM-32UV Pro vs Radioddity GD-168

Our pick

Baofeng DM-32UV Pro$59.49

The Baofeng DM-32UV Pro is the clear winner here. It outperforms the GD-168 across nearly every measurable dimension while costing $40 less.

The single most important differentiator is feature set. The DM-32UV Pro includes DMR digital mode, APRS positioning, and GPS capability—modern features that serious operators expect. The GD-168 lacks all three, making it essentially a basic analog-only radio. Combined with the DM-32UV Pro's superior overall score of 78 versus 44, this isn't a close call.

The DM-32UV Pro should appeal to operators who want digital capability, emergency communication features, and better value for money. The GD-168 might interest only budget-conscious users seeking the absolute cheapest radio, though even then the higher-scored DM-32UV Pro costs less per feature.

Simply put, buy the Baofeng DM-32UV Pro. It delivers more functionality at a lower price point, making the Radioddity GD-168 difficult to recommend to any amateur radio operator. The DM-32UV Pro represents genuinely better value and capability for the amateur radio market.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious beginner exploring digital modes

    The Baofeng offers essential DMR and APRS features at a much lower price point.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro
  • New operator needing simple analog reliability

    The Radioddity's analog-only focus simplifies operation for those just starting out.

    Radioddity GD-168
  • Hobbyist needing multi-mode versatility and features

    Its inclusion of DMR, APRS, and GPS makes it a highly versatile general utility radio.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro
  • Technician class needing reliable secondary field radio

    The dedicated analog functionality provides stable communication when digital modes fail.

    Radioddity GD-168
  • Operator exploring digital modes on a limited budget

    It provides advanced digital features like DMR without the high cost of competitors.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro
  • Advanced digital enthusiasts needing seamless setup

    While not perfect, its feature set is more robust for exploring complex digital modes.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro

Reasons to choose Baofeng DM-32UV Pro

  • 58% cheaper ($59.49 vs $139.99)
  • 100% more TX power (10W vs 5W)
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • IP67 water resistance
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radioddity GD-168

  • Has color TFT display

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng DM-32UV ProSpecRadioddity GD-168
$59.49
Price
$139.99
84
Overall Score
71
+18% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
5.00W
2.0× difference
4000
Memory Channels
4000
Battery
1800 mAh
Display
1.77in TFT Color
IP67
IP Rating
Authorized
FCC Authorization
Not Found
Army Green
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Army Green
Color
Black
9 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts
50 Ohms
Impedance
16 Ohms
1
Tuner Type
UHF VHF
DM32UV
Model Number
GD-168
1 X 33cm Antenna & 1X 21cm Gooseneck Antenna, 1 X Battery & 1 X SRH-805S Antenna, 1 X Earpiece & 1 X Radio Case & 7 X Antenna Silicone Cover, 1 X Radio, 1X Type-c Cable & 1 X Base Charger
Built-In Media
1 x 1800mAh Battery, 1 x 2600mAh Battery, 1 x Belt Clip, 1 x Adaptor, 1 x Desktop Charger Base, 1 x Type-C Cable (for programming & charging), 1 x GD-168 DMR Radio, 1 x Standard ANT, 1 x 15’’ Long ANT
108-136 MHz (AM), 65-108 MHz (FM), UHF 400.000-470.000 MHz (RX、TX), VHF 136.000-174.000 MHz (RX、TX)
Frequency Range
UHF, VHF
1
Mfr Part Number
QYWRDGDYLB11
Personal Computer
Compatible Devices
DMR devices, FM radios, compatible accessories
Digital Display
Additional Features
Digital Display, Long Range, Noise Reduction, USB-C Rechargeable & Programmable, Voice Operated Transmission
1
Warranty Description
18 month warranty
USB
Connectivity Protocol
DMR
8.87"D x 2.84"W x 10.88"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
4.07"D x 2.11"W x 2.11"H

Made your choice?

Baofeng DM-32UV ProPICK

$59.49 on Amazon

Radioddity GD-168

$139.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons