Baofeng DM-1701 vs Retevis RT95

The Baofeng DM-1701 is the clear winner here. It outscores the RT95 by 10 points overall and costs $56 less, making it the better value proposition for most users.

The single most important differentiator is DMR capability. The DM-1701 supports DMR digital mode, while the RT95 does not. This is significant because DMR access opens up regional repeater networks and digital voice communities that analog-only radios cannot reach. For someone wanting to future-proof their investment or access growing digital networks, this feature gap is substantial.

The RT95's only advantage is CHIRP programmability, which is convenient but hardly essential given that most users can manage programming through manufacturer software or local repeater club support.

The DM-1701 should appeal to budget-conscious operators who want digital mode flexibility and don't mind the manufacturer's programming software. The RT95 suits operators who prioritize ease of programming and are satisfied with analog-only operation at a mid-range price point.

Buy the DM-1701. It delivers better features at a lower price, and DMR support matters for long-term usability in the current amateur radio landscape.