Quansheng TK11 vs Retevis HA1UV

The Retevis HA1UV is the clear winner here. Despite being $40 cheaper, it outperforms the Quansheng TK11 significantly, earning a 63/100 overall score versus 26/100. Neither radio offers advanced features like DMR, APRS, or GPS, and both lack detailed TX power specifications—suggesting they're entry-level units with similar modest capabilities in those respects.

The single most important differentiator is CHIRP support. The HA1UV's compatibility with CHIRP programming software makes frequency management and customization dramatically easier, while the TK11 requires manual programming or proprietary software. This alone justifies the HA1UV's higher rating and makes it substantially more practical for real-world use.

The TK11 appeals only to budget-conscious buyers who don't value ease of use, though at $97 it's not meaningfully cheaper anyway. The HA1UV should interest anyone seeking reliable entry-level performance combined with user-friendly software support.

Get the Retevis HA1UV. It's cheaper, scores higher across the board, and the CHIRP support eliminates a major frustration point. The TK11 offers no compelling reason to choose it over this superior alternative.