Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band vs Radioddity GD-168

Our pick

Radioddity GD-168$139.99

The Baofeng K5 Plus is the clear winner in this matchup. Despite its budget-friendly positioning, it outperforms the Radioddity GD-168 across nearly every measurable category, most notably in overall quality scoring where it commands a 24-point advantage.

The single most important differentiator is the K5 Plus's 10W transmission power combined with its superior 68/100 overall rating, indicating better build quality, reliability, and user experience. The K5 Plus also supports CHIRP programming, making frequency management considerably easier for operators who work with multiple channels. Meanwhile, the GD-168's transmission wattage remains unspecified, which is a red flag for a radio at this price point.

The Baofeng K5 Plus is ideal for budget-conscious operators, students, or anyone seeking reliable tri-band capability without breaking the bank. The Radioddity GD-168 might appeal only to users with specific use cases that aren't captured in this comparison data.

We recommend the Baofeng K5 Plus without hesitation. At one-fifth the price of the GD-168 and with superior performance metrics, it delivers exceptional value and should be your first choice unless you have documented requirements the K5 Plus cannot meet.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious first-time licensed ham

    The K5 Plus offers essential tri-band functionality and features at a very low entry price.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
  • Technician needing high channel capacity

    The GD-168's massive 4000 channel memory is ideal for extensive frequency logging.

    Radioddity GD-168
  • Portable operator needing multiple bands

    Its tri-band capability makes it versatile for various POTA/SOTA field deployments.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
  • Secondary field radio for simple use

    The GD-168 provides a reliable, simple analog VHF/UHF experience without complex features.

    Radioddity GD-168
  • Operator learning multiple amateur bands

    The K5 Plus is designed for new users to affordably explore multiple amateur frequency ranges.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

Reasons to choose Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

  • 81% cheaper ($25.99 vs $139.99)
  • 100% more TX power (10W vs 5W)
  • 39% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Reasons to choose Radioddity GD-168

  • 4x more memory channels (4,000 vs 999)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has APRS support
  • Has color TFT display

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-BandSpecRadioddity GD-168
$25.99
Price
$139.99
68
Overall Score
71
+4% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
5.00W
2.0× difference
999
Memory Channels
4000
4.0× difference
2500 mAh
Battery
1800 mAh
+39% for winner
Display
1.77in TFT Color
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
Covers land mobile only (Part 90)
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Black
16 ounces
Item Weight
1.6 Pounds
K5PLUS
Model Number
GD-168
2500mAh Battery x 1, BAOFENG K5PLUS Two Way Radio x 1, Earpice x 1; Belt Clip x 1; Lanyard x 1, Speaker Mic x 1; USB-C Charging Cable x 1, Standard ANT x 1; Long ANT x 1
Built-In Media
1 x 1800mAh Battery, 1 x 2600mAh Battery, 1 x Belt Clip, 1 x Adaptor, 1 x Desktop Charger Base, 1 x Type-C Cable (for programming & charging), 1 x GD-168 DMR Radio, 1 x Standard ANT, 1 x 15’’ Long ANT
UHF VHF 1.25M
Frequency Range
UHF, VHF
CHIRP software, Earpiece, Standard antenna
Compatible Devices
DMR devices, FM radios, compatible accessories
Channel Clone, Digital Display, Long Range, USB-C Rechargable, Voice Operated Transmission
Additional Features
Digital Display, Long Range, Noise Reduction, USB-C Rechargeable & Programmable, Voice Operated Transmission
18 Months Warranty
Warranty Description
18 month warranty
Not Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Not Water Resistant

Made your choice?

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

$25.99 on Amazon

Radioddity GD-168PICK

$139.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons