Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

AnyTone AT-D168UV vs Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

Our pick

AnyTone AT-D168UV$139.99

The Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band is the clear winner for most users, despite nearly identical overall scores. The single most important differentiator is price versus features: you're paying five times more for the AnyTone to access DMR and APRS capabilities that most casual operators never use, while the Baofeng delivers superior power output and essential programmability at a fraction of the cost.

The AnyTone AT-D168UV is best for digital mode enthusiasts and those serious about DMR networks or APRS tracking who can justify the premium investment. The Baofeng K5 Plus is ideal for general purpose VHF/UHF operation, budget-conscious hams, and anyone prioritizing practical range and ease of programming through CHIRP.

For the vast majority of amateur radio operators, the Baofeng K5 Plus offers exceptional value. Its 10-watt output provides noticeably better coverage than the AnyTone's 5 watts, and CHIRP compatibility means you're not dependent on proprietary software or Chinese customer support. Unless you specifically need DMR interoperability or APRS functionality, spending an extra $114 makes no practical sense. Buy the Baofeng and invest the savings in a quality antenna or repeater directory.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious entry-level ham on a tight spend

    It costs much less than the alternative while covering VHF, UHF, and 1.25m for learning multiple bands.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
  • First-time licensee wanting digital modes

    DMR support and a beginner-friendly interface make it a smoother entry point into digital operating.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Operator needing DMR and APRS for network access

    It supports DMR and APRS and offers multi-network support that the other radio cannot match.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Public service or temporary event communications

    Its lower cost and higher 10W transmit power suit temporary deployments where radios may be lost or abused.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
  • Portable operator prioritizing a lighter radio

    At 220g it is noticeably lighter than the 290g alternative, which matters for field activations.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Hobbyist wanting a larger channel bank

    Its 4000-channel memory far exceeds the 999 channels of the other radio for busy programming needs.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV

Reasons to choose AnyTone AT-D168UV

  • 4x more memory channels (4,000 vs 999)
  • 70g lighter (220g vs 290g)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has APRS support
  • Has color TFT display

Reasons to choose Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

  • 100% more TX power (10W vs 5W)
  • 39% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

AnyTone AT-D168UVSpecBaofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
$139.99
Price
—
68
Overall Score
51
+33% for winner
5.00W
TX Power (High)
10.00W
2.0× difference
4000
Memory Channels
999
4.0× difference
220g
Weight
290g
+32% difference
1800 mAh
Battery
2500 mAh
+39% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
—
Covers land mobile only (Part 90)
FCC Authorization
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Black
AT-D168UV
Model Number
K5PLUS
2pcs Li-ion Battery Pack, Antenna, Battery Charger, Power Adapter, TYPE C Cable
Built-In Media
2500mAh Battery x 1, BAOFENG K5PLUS Two Way Radio x 1, Earpice x 1; Belt Clip x 1; Lanyard x 1, Speaker Mic x 1; USB-C Charging Cable x 1, Standard ANT x 1; Long ANT x 1
Repeater
Compatible Devices
CHIRP software, Earpiece, Standard antenna
Dual Band, Emergency Alarm, Lightweight, Long Range, Rechargeable
Additional Features
Channel Clone, Digital Display, Long Range, USB-C Rechargable, Voice Operated Transmission
12 months from Purchase Date
Warranty Description
18 Months Warranty
Not Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Not Water Resistant

Made your choice?

AnyTone AT-D168UVPICK

$139.99 on Amazon

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

Search on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons