Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Jul 2026

Baofeng DM-32UV Pro vs Radtel RT-730

Our pick

Baofeng DM-32UV Pro$59.49

The Baofeng DM-32UV Pro is the clear winner for most users. Both radios deliver identical transmit power at dramatically different price points, but the DM-32UV Pro justifies its premium with significantly more capability. It includes DMR digital mode support, APRS positioning, and integrated GPS—features that transform it from a basic FM transceiver into a modern digital radio platform. The RT-730's CHIRP compatibility is convenient for programming, but this advantage is marginal compared to losing three major feature sets.

The single most important differentiator is digital mode support and GPS integration. The DM-32UV Pro opens access to nationwide DMR networks and automatic position reporting, while the RT-730 remains limited to analog FM.

Budget-conscious operators who only need basic FM scanning and local repeater access should consider the Radtel RT-730. Users who want modern digital capabilities, emergency positioning, or network connectivity must choose the Baofeng DM-32UV Pro.

For most amateur radio operators, the Baofeng DM-32UV Pro is the better investment despite the higher cost. The additional features justify the price difference, and its superior overall score reflects genuine capability advantages that will matter as amateur radio evolves.

Runner-up
Radtel RT-730

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Hobbyist needing multi-mode digital features

    Its DMR, APRS, and GPS features offer superior versatility for diverse operations.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro
  • New or budget-conscious ham operator

    The lower price point and CHIRP support make it an excellent entry-level radio.

    RT-730
  • Operator prioritizing open-source firmware support

    CHIRP support ensures maximum compatibility and advanced configuration options.

    RT-730
  • General utility and field operations user

    The combination of high features and utility makes it ideal for varied field use.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro
  • Advanced digital radio enthusiast

    It provides a wider array of digital modes and advanced features for exploration.

    Baofeng DM-32UV Pro

Reasons to choose Baofeng DM-32UV Pro

  • 20x more memory channels (4,000 vs 199)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has APRS support
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • IP67 water resistance
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-730

  • 34% cheaper ($39.00 vs $59.49)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng DM-32UV ProSpecRadtel RT-730
$59.49
Price
$39.00
84
Overall Score
63
+33% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
10.00W
4000
Memory Channels
199
20.0× difference
Battery
2500 mAh
Display
LCD
IP67
IP Rating
Authorized
FCC Authorization
Not Found
Army Green
color
1 PCS + Prog Cable
1
unitCount
1
755745220700
UPC
016392405248
Army Green
Color
1 PCS + Prog Cable
9 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts
1
Tuner Type
UHF/VHF
DM32UV
Model Number
RT-730
1 X 33cm Antenna & 1X 21cm Gooseneck Antenna, 1 X Battery & 1 X SRH-805S Antenna, 1 X Earpiece & 1 X Radio Case & 7 X Antenna Silicone Cover, 1 X Radio, 1X Type-c Cable & 1 X Base Charger
Built-In Media
1 RT-730 Ham Radio, 1xProgramming Cable,1x 2500mAh Li-ion Battery Pack, 1x Standard Long Antenna, 1x Desktop charger, 1x belt clip, 1x user manual
108-136 MHz (AM), 65-108 MHz (FM), UHF 400.000-470.000 MHz (RX、TX), VHF 136.000-174.000 MHz (RX、TX)
Frequency Range
144-148MHZ / 420-450MHZ
1
Mfr Part Number
RT-730
Personal Computer
Compatible Devices
Two-way radios on the same frequency band, compatible accessories like headsets, earpieces, or external antennas, and computers for programming.
Digital Display
Additional Features
16-630Mhz Receiver, Long Range, High quality resolution LCD, Type C charging, Full band radio am/fm/air/cb/ham/noaa/short wave receiver
1
Warranty Description
1 Year
USB
Connectivity Protocol
UHF, VHF

Made your choice?

Baofeng DM-32UV ProPICK

$59.49 on Amazon

Radtel RT-730

$39.00 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons