Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

AnyTone AT-D168UV vs Radtel RT-730

Our pick

AnyTone AT-D168UV$139.99

The AnyTone AT-D168UV is the clear winner for most amateur radio operators, despite its higher price point. The single most important differentiator is feature set versus cost: the AT-D168UV offers DMR digital mode and APRS capability, which are increasingly essential for modern ham radio operations, while the RT-730 remains an analog-only radio with twice the transmit power but significantly fewer features.

The AT-D168UV suits operators who want future-proofed digital capability and are willing to invest in their hobby's evolution. The RT-730 appeals to budget-conscious hams who primarily operate analog FM and need maximum power efficiency per dollar spent.

The AT-D168UV's four-point score advantage reflects its broader functionality, and that gap would likely widen among operators who actively use digital modes or APRS positioning. However, the RT-730 isn't a bad radio for its price class if your local repeaters are purely analog and power efficiency matters more than features. For most amateur radio pursuits today, the extra hundred dollars for the AT-D168UV represents reasonable investment in capability you'll actually use.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious buyer wanting the lowest entry cost

    It costs far less than the alternative, making it the sensible pick for a tight budget.

    RT-730
  • New operator entering digital DMR and APRS

    It supports DMR and APRS, which the Radtel lacks, so it fits digital operating from day one.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Field day backup radio buyer

    Its 10W output and low cost make it a practical spare for field day setups.

    RT-730
  • Operator needing a large memory bank

    With 4000 channels against 199, it handles multi-network and repeater lists far better.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Hobbyist who wants CHIRP programming support

    It is specifically listed for CHIRP support, simplifying programming for budget-minded operators.

    RT-730
  • Portable operator prioritizing a lighter handheld

    Its 220g weight and broader feature set suit a dedicated backup HT for DMR and APRS work.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV

Reasons to choose AnyTone AT-D168UV

  • 20x more memory channels (4,000 vs 199)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has APRS support
  • Has color TFT display
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-730

  • 72% cheaper ($39.00 vs $139.99)
  • 100% more TX power (10W vs 5W)
  • 39% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

AnyTone AT-D168UVSpecRadtel RT-730
$139.99
Price
$39.00
68
Overall Score
63
+8% for winner
5.00W
TX Power (High)
10.00W
2.0× difference
4000
Memory Channels
199
20.0× difference
220g
Weight
—
1800 mAh
Battery
2500 mAh
+39% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
LCD
Covers land mobile only (Part 90)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
1 PCS + Prog Cable
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
1 PCS + Prog Cable
7.4 Volts (DC)
Voltage
7.4 Volts
VHF/UHF
Tuner Type
UHF/VHF
AT-D168UV
Model Number
RT-730
2pcs Li-ion Battery Pack, Antenna, Battery Charger, Power Adapter, TYPE C Cable
Built-In Media
1 RT-730 Ham Radio, 1xProgramming Cable,1x 2500mAh Li-ion Battery Pack, 1x Standard Long Antenna, 1x Desktop charger, 1x belt clip, 1x user manual
AT-D168UV
Mfr Part Number
RT-730
Repeater
Compatible Devices
Two-way radios on the same frequency band, compatible accessories like headsets, earpieces, or external antennas, and computers for programming.
Dual Band, Emergency Alarm, Lightweight, Long Range, Rechargeable
Additional Features
16-630Mhz Receiver, Long Range, High quality resolution LCD, Type C charging, Full band radio am/fm/air/cb/ham/noaa/short wave receiver
12 months from Purchase Date
Warranty Description
1 Year
Not Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Waterproof

Made your choice?

AnyTone AT-D168UVPICK

$139.99 on Amazon

Radtel RT-730

$39.00 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons