Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng BF-F8HP vs Radtel RT-470X

Our pick

Baofeng BF-F8HP$29.89

The Baofeng BF-F8HP is the clear winner for most users. The single most important differentiator is power output: the BF-F8HP delivers a confirmed 10W of transmit power, while the Radtel's output remains unspecified, which raises immediate concerns about its real-world performance and range capabilities.

The BF-F8HP also includes GPS functionality, a practical feature for emergency situations and field operations that the Radtel lacks entirely. While the BF-F8HP costs $19 more, you're paying for documented specifications and proven capability. The Radtel's CHIRP compatibility is convenient but doesn't compensate for the power and feature gaps.

Buy the BF-F8HP if you want a dependable radio with known performance specs and practical features for varied operating scenarios. Buy the Radtel only if you're an absolute beginner with a strict budget and value ease of programming above all else, understanding you're making significant compromises.

We recommend the BF-F8HP. For an amateur radio investment, transparency and documented power output matter more than saving twenty dollars. The better score and feature set justify the modest premium.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • First-time hams needing basic VHF/UHF coverage

    The BF-F8HP offers more channels and higher TX power for initial learning.

    BF-F8HP PRO 10W Tri Band Two-Way Radio, IP54, 1000 Channels, GPS, Aviation RX, USB-C
  • Budget-conscious local simplex operations

    The RT-470X's lower price and CHIRP feature are ideal for local, simple use.

    RT-470X
  • Operators needing GPS and basic field backup

    The built-in GPS and higher TX power make the BF-F8HP better for portable field use.

    BF-F8HP PRO 10W Tri Band Two-Way Radio, IP54, 1000 Channels, GPS, Aviation RX, USB-C
  • Technicians needing multi-band receiving capability

    The RT-470X's multi-band receiver and CHIRP feature offer better reception versatility.

    RT-470X
  • Beginners prioritizing ease of use and low cost

    The RT-470X has a higher beginner score and is cheaper, making it a gentle entry point.

    RT-470X

Reasons to choose Baofeng BF-F8HP

  • 9% cheaper ($29.89 vs $32.99)
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-470X

  • 2x more memory channels (256 vs 128)
  • 33% more battery (2800 mAh vs 2100 mAh)
  • IP54 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng BF-F8HPSpecRadtel RT-470X
$29.89
Price
$32.99
74
Overall Score
66
+12% for winner
8.00W
TX Power (High)
128
Memory Channels
256
2.0× difference
2100 mAh
Battery
2800 mAh
+33% for winner
Color LCD
Display
1.77in TFT Color
IP Rating
IP54
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Standard
1
unitCount
1
701748708974
UPC
715748983927
Black
Color
Standard
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts
UHF, VHF
Tuner Type
FM/AM
10.1 Ounces
Item Weight
448 Grams
BF-F8HP
Model Number
RT-470X
baofeng
Built-In Media
1x Radtel RT-470X Ham Radio,1x 2800mAh Type-C Battery, 1x 7.87-inch Dual Band 145/435 Antenna, 1x 39-inch USB-C Charger Cable, 1x Belt Clip with Metal Piece, 1x English User Manual,1x AC Power Adapter with USB Port (FCC ID: 2AZSA-RT470X)
BF-F8HP
Mfr Part Number
RT-470X
Two-way radios, headsets, earpieces, external antennas, and other devices operating on VHF (136-174 MHz) or UHF (400-520 MHz) frequencies, as well as accessories compatible with the UV-5R.
Compatible Devices
K-connector
Only BaoFeng Tech is Authorized to Resell, Software and Downloads Available at: https://baofengtech.com/bf-f8hp
Additional Features
Air band RX, Chirp Programming, Multi-band TX/RX, Type-C Charger, Wireless Copy frequency
18 Hours
Battery Average Life
8 Hours
1 year
Warranty Description
1 Year Warranty
2"D x 2"W x 10.5"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
1.57"D x 2.28"W x 4.6"H

Made your choice?

Baofeng BF-F8HPPICK

$29.89 on Amazon

Radtel RT-470X

$32.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons