Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng 5RM vs Radtel RT-880G

Our pick

Baofeng 5RM$25.99

The Baofeng 5RM is the clear winner here, despite the Radtel's advanced features. The single most important differentiator is the price-to-performance ratio: you're paying nearly four times as much for the RT-880G while actually receiving a lower overall score of 66 versus 73.

The 5RM's confirmed 10W transmit power and CHIRP compatibility make it an excellent entry-level radio for basic VHF/UHF communications and programming flexibility. The RT-880G adds APRS and GPS capabilities, which are genuinely useful for location tracking and digital messaging, but these features don't justify the cost premium when the baseline radio performs better overall.

The Baofeng 5RM suits newcomers to amateur radio or anyone wanting a reliable, budget-friendly handheld for standard FM communications and experimentation. The Radtel RT-880G makes sense only for users specifically needing APRS and GPS functionality and willing to accept lower overall performance as a trade-off for those specialized features.

For most buyers, invest in the Baofeng 5RM and allocate the seventy dollars saved toward a better antenna or second radio. The extra features on the Radtel simply don't compensate for the cost and score difference.

Winner
Baofeng 5RM
Runner-up
Radtel RT-880G

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • First-time, budget-conscious hobbyist

    Its low cost and high channel count make it perfect for learning the basics.

    Baofeng 5RM
  • SOTA/POTA activators needing location services

    The built-in GPS and APRS features are essential for logging outdoor activity.

    RT-880G
  • Emergency preparedness and general utility use

    Its multi-band coverage and low cost make it excellent for emergency readiness.

    Baofeng 5RM
  • ARES/Emergency groups needing position reporting

    APRS and GPS integration simplifies coordinated group communication during crises.

    RT-880G
  • Operator needing maximum features on a tight budget

    It offers a massive feature set and channel capacity for the lowest price point.

    Baofeng 5RM
  • Experienced user needing specific digital modes

    The advanced features like APRS and GPS suggest more specialized functionality.

    RT-880G

Reasons to choose Baofeng 5RM

  • 69% cheaper ($25.99 vs $83.16)
  • 4% more battery (2500 mAh vs 2400 mAh)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility
  • Has color TFT display
  • IP65 water resistance
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-880G

  • 3% more memory channels (1,024 vs 999)
  • Has APRS support
  • Has built-in GPS

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng 5RMSpecRadtel RT-880G
$25.99
Price
$83.16
76
Overall Score
72
+5% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
10.00W
999
Memory Channels
1024
+2% for winner
2500 mAh
Battery
2400 mAh
+4% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
IP65
IP Rating
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Standard
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Standard
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts
VHF/1.25M/UHF
Tuner Type
AM/FM/SSB
5RM
Model Number
RT-880G
1X 5RM radio, 1X charging base station, 1X Type C charging cable, 1X 6.1" antenna, 1X 15.12" 771 antenna, 1X 2500mAh battery, 1X handset with mic, 1X Belt, 1X hand strap, 1X user manual
Built-In Media
1x RT-880G Main unit, 1x 2400mAh Li-ion Battery,1x Dual band antenna,1x Belt Clip, 1x Type C charging Cable,1x Power supple with USB port,1x English User Manual
144-174MHz, 420-470MH
Frequency Range
144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz
5RM
Mfr Part Number
RT-880G
BF-F8HP Pro, BaoFeng AR-5RM, BaoFeng UV-5R, baofeng k5 plus, weather radio
Compatible Devices
Radtel two-way radios, devices on 144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz frequencies, compatible external antennas
1.77inch colour screen, 10W power, Frequency copy, USB C charging
Additional Features
GPS/APRS, AM FM SSB Reception, 1024 Channels,Cross Band Repeater

Made your choice?

Baofeng 5RMPICK

$25.99 on Amazon

Radtel RT-880G

$83.16 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons