Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng 5RM vs Radtel RT-4D DMR

Our pick

Radtel RT-4D DMR$49.99

The Radtel RT-4D DMR edges out the Baofeng 5RM overall, but this isn't a clear-cut victory. The RT-4D scores higher at 77 versus 73 and offers genuine digital capabilities with DMR and GPS, making it more future-proof. However, the 5RM's superior 10W transmit power and half the price tag make it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious operators.

The most important differentiator is DMR capability. The RT-4D's digital mode support fundamentally changes what you can accomplish on the radio, enabling access to DMR repeaters and networks worldwide. This matters significantly if you operate in areas with digital infrastructure.

The Baofeng 5RM suits operators on a tight budget who prioritize raw TX power and analog simplicity, or those who mainly use CHIRP-compatible programming. The RT-4D appeals to technically engaged amateurs wanting digital networking capabilities and GPS positioning, despite accepting lower power output.

For most hobbyists, the RT-4D RT-4D deserves your consideration due to its feature set and slightly higher rating. However, if cost is your primary concern or you operate exclusively on analog frequencies in your area, the 5RM remains a respectable entry point. Neither radio is exceptional, but the RT-4D's capabilities justify its premium.

Runner-up
Baofeng 5RM
Winner
Radtel RT-4D DMR

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Absolute beginner learning the hobby

    Its high beginner score and simple features make it ideal for initial learning.

    Baofeng 5RM
  • Operator needing secure digital comms

    The built-in DMR capability provides the secure digital communication needed.

    RT-4D DMR
  • Budget-conscious prepper/emergency use

    The extremely low price point makes it perfect for emergency preparedness budgets.

    Baofeng 5RM
  • Advanced user needing versatility and GPS

    The combination of DMR, GPS, and Bluetooth offers advanced operational flexibility.

    RT-4D DMR
  • Portable field operations (POTA/SOTA)

    Its lower weight and integrated GPS make it superior for extended outdoor use.

    RT-4D DMR

Reasons to choose Baofeng 5RM

  • 48% cheaper ($25.99 vs $49.99)
  • 100% more TX power (10W vs 5W)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility
  • Has color TFT display
  • IP65 water resistance
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-4D DMR

  • 3% more memory channels (1,024 vs 999)
  • 40% more battery (3500 mAh vs 2500 mAh)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has Bluetooth

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng 5RMSpecRadtel RT-4D DMR
$25.99
Price
$49.99
76
Overall Score
77
+1% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
5.00W
2.0× difference
999
Memory Channels
1024
+2% for winner
Weight
198g
2500 mAh
Battery
3500 mAh
+41% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
LCD
IP65
IP Rating
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
1
unitCount
1
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts
VHF/1.25M/UHF
Tuner Type
UHF/VHF
5RM
Model Number
RT-4D
1X 5RM radio, 1X charging base station, 1X Type C charging cable, 1X 6.1" antenna, 1X 15.12" 771 antenna, 1X 2500mAh battery, 1X handset with mic, 1X Belt, 1X hand strap, 1X user manual
Built-In Media
1x Rt-4d Radio, 1x 3500mAh Li-ion battery, 1x Desktop charger, 1x USB-C cable, 1x Dual band antenna, 1x belt clip, 1x Eng user manual
144-174MHz, 420-470MH
Frequency Range
144-148/420-450MHz
5RM
Mfr Part Number
RT-4D
BF-F8HP Pro, BaoFeng AR-5RM, BaoFeng UV-5R, baofeng k5 plus, weather radio
Compatible Devices
Two-way radios on 144-148/420-450MHz frequency bands, compatible headsets, and external antennas
1.77inch colour screen, 10W power, Frequency copy, USB C charging
Additional Features
Dual Band Analog/Digital , Type C charger, DMR/Analog,, Single Call/Group Call, NOAA, Two-Time Slot,Spectrum, FM Radio
48 Hours
Battery Average Life
5 days

Made your choice?

Baofeng 5RM

$25.99 on Amazon

Radtel RT-4D DMRPICK

$49.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons