Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Radtel RT-730 vs Retevis RA89

Our pick

Radtel RT-730$39.00

The Radtel RT-730 is the clear winner here. Despite both radios lacking advanced features like DMR, APRS, and GPS, the RT-730 offers superior value and a higher overall rating.

The single most important differentiator is price paired with performance. The RT-730 costs $15 less at $39 while scoring 5 points higher (63 vs 58). You're getting a better-reviewed radio for less money. The RT-730's confirmed 10W transmit power is another advantage, while the RA89's TX power remains unknown, which raises questions about its actual capabilities.

The RT-730 suits budget-conscious operators who want a no-nonsense radio with solid performance and proven CHIRP compatibility. The RA89 makes sense only if you have specific requirements we haven't identified or prefer the Retevis brand ecosystem, but the specs don't support that choice here.

Buy the Radtel RT-730. It delivers better value, higher user satisfaction ratings, and a known power specification. Unless you have compelling reasons to prefer the RA89, the RT-730 is simply the smarter purchase at this price point.

Runner-up
Retevis RA89

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious beginner ham radio operator

    The Radtel offers more features and power for a lower initial cost.

    RT-730
  • Field day or emergency backup radio

    Its IP68 rating makes it superior for adverse weather and rough field use.

    Retevis RA89
  • New hobbyist needing a reliable first HT

    The RA89 is designed for new users and excels in basic field deployments.

    Retevis RA89
  • Operator needing reliable high output power

    The RT-730 provides a higher transmit power output of 10W.

    RT-730
  • Ham needing CHIRP support for digital modes

    Both radios support CHIRP, but the Radtel offers a better overall feature set.

    RT-730
  • Ham prioritizing the lowest possible entry cost

    The Radtel RT-730 is priced significantly lower than the Retevis RA89.

    RT-730

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-730

  • 40% cheaper ($39.00 vs $64.99)

Reasons to choose Retevis RA89

  • 1% more memory channels (200 vs 199)
  • IP68 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Radtel RT-730SpecRetevis RA89
$39.00
Price
$64.99
63
Overall Score
55
+15% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
199
Memory Channels
200
2500 mAh
Battery
2500 mAh
LCD
Display
LCD
IP Rating
IP68
No grant found
FCC Authorization
No grant found
1 PCS + Prog Cable
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
1 PCS + Prog Cable
Color
Black
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
UHF/VHF
Tuner Type
dual band
RT-730
Model Number
RA89
1 RT-730 Ham Radio, 1xProgramming Cable,1x 2500mAh Li-ion Battery Pack, 1x Standard Long Antenna, 1x Desktop charger, 1x belt clip, 1x user manual
Built-In Media
1 x 2500mAh Li-ion Batteries, 1 x RA89 Two Way Radio, 1 x USB-C Charging Cable, Belt Clip, User Manual
144-148MHZ / 420-450MHZ
Frequency Range
144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz
Two-way radios on the same frequency band, compatible accessories like headsets, earpieces, or external antennas, and computers for programming.
Compatible Devices
Dual Band (VHF, UHF) Two-Way Radios, 2Pin K Plug Accessories
16-630Mhz Receiver, Long Range, High quality resolution LCD, Type C charging, Full band radio am/fm/air/cb/ham/noaa/short wave receiver
Additional Features
Long Range, Rechargable, Noise Reduction, IP68 Waterproof, FM Radio, Type-C Charging, dual band ham radio; handheld radio; ham radio handheld; amateur radio; waterproof two way radio; walkie talkies long range
1 Year
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours

Made your choice?

Radtel RT-730PICK

$39.00 on Amazon

Retevis RA89

$64.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons