Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Sep 2026

AnyTone AT-D168UV vs Retevis RA89

Our pick

AnyTone AT-D168UV$139.99

The Retevis RA89 is the better value for most users. While the AnyTone AT-D168UV offers superior listed specifications for the money—including DMR and APRS support—the RA89's significantly lower price and stronger owner feedback make it the more practical choice.

The single most important differentiator is price versus features. The AnyTone costs more than double the RA89 while adding digital modes that many casual operators never use. The RA89 owners report a 4.5/5 rating across 278 reviews versus the AnyTone's 3.7/5 from 16 reviews, suggesting more consistent satisfaction among a much larger user base.

Buy the AnyTone AT-D168UV if you specifically need DMR or APRS capabilities and the lighter weight matters for your use case. Buy the Retevis RA89 if you want a straightforward analog handheld with CHIRP programming support at the lowest cost.

We lack the AnyTone's transmit power figure, so direct power comparison isn't possible. For budget-conscious operators without specialized digital requirements, the RA89 delivers solid specifications at half the price with notably better owner feedback, making it the smarter recommendation.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • New operator needing digital modes

    The AT-D168UV supports DMR and APRS, offering superior modern functionality.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Strict budget first-time hobbyist

    The RA89 is significantly cheaper and perfect for learning the basics of radio operation.

    Retevis RA89
  • Emergency field deployment/ARES

    Its IP68 rating makes the RA89 ideal for adverse weather and field use.

    Retevis RA89
  • Operator needing multi-network support

    The AT-D168UV's advanced features support multiple digital networks and modes.

    AnyTone AT-D168UV
  • Portable backup radio for general use

    It offers reliable basic functionality and portability without breaking the bank.

    Retevis RA89

Reasons to choose AnyTone AT-D168UV

  • 20x more memory channels (4,000 vs 200)
  • 75g lighter (220g vs 295g)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has APRS support
  • Has color TFT display
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Retevis RA89

  • 46% cheaper ($74.99 vs $139.99)
  • 39% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility
  • IP68 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

AnyTone AT-D168UVSpecRetevis RA89
$139.99
Price
$74.99
68
Overall Score
51
+33% for winner
5.00W
TX Power (High)
—
4000
Memory Channels
200
20.0× difference
220g
Weight
295g
+33% difference
1800 mAh
Battery
2500 mAh
+39% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
LCD
—
IP Rating
IP68
Covers land mobile only (Part 90)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Black
7.4 Volts (DC)
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
VHF/UHF
Tuner Type
dual band
AT-D168UV
Model Number
RA89
2pcs Li-ion Battery Pack, Antenna, Battery Charger, Power Adapter, TYPE C Cable
Built-In Media
1 x 2500mAh Li-ion Batteries, 1 x RA89 Two Way Radio, 1 x USB-C Charging Cable, Belt Clip, User Manual
Repeater
Compatible Devices
Dual Band (VHF, UHF) Two-Way Radios, 2Pin K Plug Accessories
Dual Band, Emergency Alarm, Lightweight, Long Range, Rechargeable
Additional Features
Long Range, Rechargable, Noise Reduction, IP68 Waterproof, FM Radio, Type-C Charging, dual band ham radio; handheld radio; ham radio handheld; amateur radio; waterproof two way radio; walkie talkies long range
12 months from Purchase Date
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours

Made your choice?

AnyTone AT-D168UVPICK

$139.99 on Amazon

Retevis RA89

$74.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons