RadioRanked verdict
Updated Nov 2026QYT KT-8900D vs Yaesu FTM-300DR
Our pick
QYT KT-8900D$76.85
The Yaesu FTM-300DR is the winner for most users, but the choice depends on your needs and budget.
The single most important differentiator is feature set. The FTM-300DR includes APRS and GPS, making it capable of location tracking and automatic position reporting; the QYT KT-8900D lacks these entirely. The FTM-300DR also delivers double the transmit power at 50W versus 25W. The KT-8900D's sole advantage is CHIRP programmability and a known price of just $77, making it accessible for a tight budget or someone learning the hobby. We do not have pricing or weight data for the Yaesu, so we cannot compare total cost of ownership or portability.
Owners report slightly higher satisfaction with the FTM-300DR (4.6 out of 5 from 65 reviews versus 4.2 out of 5 from 287 reviews), though both radios have solid ratings from their user bases.
The KT-8900D suits budget-conscious operators who want reliable VHF/UHF coverage without advanced features and do not mind programming via computer. The FTM-300DR is for operators who value location awareness, better power output, and integrated GPS and APRS capabilities. If the FTM-300DR's price is reasonable, it offers substantially more functionality.
By use case
Which should you buy?
Budget-conscious buyer outfitting a first compact mobile install
It costs considerably less and delivers the core KT-8900 dual-band performance for a tight budget.
KT-8900DOperator who programs radios with CHIRP software
Its CHIRP-based programming suits operators who prefer computer editing over the front panel.
KT-8900DWeight-sensitive installer needing a lighter dual-band head
At roughly 1043 grams it is the lighter choice for installs where mounting weight matters.
KT-8900DOperator in an area with active System Fusion repeaters
Built-in C4FM digital support lets it use local Fusion repeaters and Wires-X nodes directly.
FTM-300DRAPRS user prioritizing fast position reporting and GPS
It offers integrated GPS, Bluetooth, and 9600 bps packet support for faster APRS position reporting.
FTM-300DRMobile operator prioritizing maximum transmit power and range
Its 50 watt transmitter doubles the 25 watt output of the competing unit for longer reach.
FTM-300DR
Reasons to choose QYT KT-8900D
- No clear advantages in this comparison
Reasons to choose Yaesu FTM-300DR
- 100% more TX power (50W vs 25W)
- Has APRS support
- Has built-in GPS
- Has Bluetooth
- Has C4FM/System Fusion
Spec battle
Spec-by-spec breakdown
Made your choice?
QYT KT-8900D
$76.85 on AmazonYaesu FTM-300DRPICK
Search on AmazonMore head-to-heads

