RadioRanked verdict
Updated Nov 2026Nagoya NA-320A (Tri-Band) vs Nagoya NA-701 (SMA-Female)
Our pick
Nagoya NA-320A (Tri-Band)$20.98
The NA-320A is the clear winner for most operators. It's a genuinely capable tri-band antenna with reasonable electrical lengths on all three bands, especially the 5/8-wave performance on UHF at 2.9 dBi. The NA-701 is severely compromised on VHF, where it's electrically short at just 0.10 wavelengths, resulting in realistic losses around 3.6 dBi. That's a significant handicap if you use the 2-meter band.
The single most important difference is electrical length on VHF. The NA-320A delivers a quarter-wave on 2-meter, which is the minimum acceptable for handheld operation. The NA-701 falls well short of this, making it unsuitable for serious VHF work despite its lower price.
Buy the NA-320A if you operate across the amateur bands and want balanced performance, especially if 2-meter is part of your regular use. The NA-701 is only worth considering if you operate primarily on UHF and rarely touch VHF, where its quarter-wave design at least provides adequate performance.
Get the NA-320A. The extra two dollars buys you genuine tri-band capability and eliminates the VHF dead weight. This is the antenna that makes sense.
By use case
Which should you buy?
Tri-band radio owner active on 1.25m
The 320A covers the 1.25m band the 701 cannot reach, and its UHF section performs better too.
NA-320AEveryday carry and pocket use
Its 203mm length suits pocket and belt carry while still covering VHF and UHF.
NA-701Budget-minded buyer on a dual-band radio
It costs less than the 320A and handles local simplex work on VHF and UHF adequately.
NA-701Distant VHF repeater and 2m reach seeker
Its quarter-wave VHF element radiates more effectively than the electrically short 701 on 2m.
NA-320AUHF-first operator focused on 70cm
The 5/8 wave UHF element on the 320A gives it a clear edge over the 701's quarter-wave design.
NA-320A
Reasons to choose Nagoya NA-320A (Tri-Band)
- Stronger on VHF (-0.4 dBi vs -3.6 dBi at 146 MHz)
- Stronger on UHF (2.9 dBi vs 0.8 dBi at 435 MHz)
- Also covers 1.25m (223 MHz)
Reasons to choose Nagoya NA-701 (SMA-Female)
- 10% cheaper ($18.98 vs $20.98)
- 9.7 in shorter to carry (203 mm vs 450 mm)
Spec battle
Spec-by-spec breakdown
Made your choice?
Nagoya NA-320A (Tri-Band)PICK
$20.98 on AmazonNagoya NA-701 (SMA-Female)
$18.98 on AmazonKeep researching
Related Buying Guides
More head-to-heads

