Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Icom IC-2730A vs Yaesu FTM-300DR

The Yaesu FTM-300DR is the clear winner here, with a significantly higher overall score of 69 versus 41. While both radios deliver identical 50-watt TX power, the Yaesu's inclusion of APRS and GPS functionality creates a substantial feature gap that directly impacts real-world usability for mobile operations. The FTM-300DR enables position tracking and emergency location capabilities that the Icom simply cannot match.

The single most important differentiator is APRS and GPS support. These aren't minor conveniences for amateur radio enthusiasts who value emergency preparedness or digital communication features. The Icom's CHIRP compatibility is useful for programming, but it doesn't compensate for missing integrated GPS and APRS capabilities.

The Icom IC-2730A suits budget-conscious operators who need straightforward dual-band FM performance without advanced digital features, particularly those comfortable managing programming through external software. The Yaesu FTM-300DR is the better choice for operators who want modern mobile functionality including position reporting and digital modes built into the radio.

Unless budget is absolutely critical and you have no use for APRS or GPS, the Yaesu FTM-300DR delivers substantially better value despite its unknown price point. It represents current-generation capabilities where the Icom feels dated by comparison.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Daily commuter wanting APRS position reporting on the road

    Built-in GPS and 9600 bps packet support make position reporting faster and simpler during daily driving.

    FTM-300DR
  • Operator in an area with active System Fusion repeaters

    C4FM digital voice support lets this radio use local Fusion repeaters and Wires-X nodes that the Icom cannot access.

    FTM-300DR
  • Buyer seeking the lowest cost per feature

    This radio costs less and offers a simpler feature set, which suits buyers who do not need digital modes or GPS.

    IC-2730A
  • Vehicle installer wanting a clean remote-head mount

    The Icom suits remote-head installations where the controller can be placed neatly away from the transceiver body.

    IC-2730A
  • Operator who monitors two bands simultaneously in one head

    Simultaneous dual-band monitoring from a single-head unit is a stated strength of the Yaesu for mobile listening.

    FTM-300DR
  • Buyer who programs a radio fleet with CHIRP

    The Icom supports CHIRP for batch programming, while the Yaesu is a poor fit for users relying on that workflow.

    IC-2730A

Reasons to choose Icom IC-2730A

  • No clear advantages in this comparison

Reasons to choose Yaesu FTM-300DR

  • Has APRS support
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • Has C4FM/System Fusion

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Icom IC-2730ASpecYaesu FTM-300DR
45
Overall Score
76
+69% for winner
50.00W
TX Power (High)
50.00W
LCD
Display
—
Not required (Part 97 amateur)
FCC Authorization
Not required (Part 97 amateur)
Black
color
black

Made your choice?

Icom IC-2730A

Search on Amazon

Yaesu FTM-300DRPICK

Search on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons