Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng UV-82HP vs Retevis RT95

Our pick

Baofeng UV-82HP$50.00

The Baofeng UV-82HP is the clear winner here. Despite both radios sharing identical feature sets (no DMR, APRS, or GPS), the UV-82HP delivers measurably better performance at a fraction of the cost.

The single most important differentiator is the combination of price and proven power output. The UV-82HP's documented 7-watt transmission capability at just $50 makes it exceptional value, while the RT95 costs 2.5 times more with unknown power specifications and a significantly lower overall score.

The UV-82HP is ideal for budget-conscious beginners and anyone seeking a reliable VHF/UHF workhorse without premium features. The RT95 might appeal only to users with specific ergonomic preferences or compatibility requirements, though those needs aren't evident from the specs provided.

For most amateur radio operators, the Baofeng UV-82HP is the straightforward recommendation. It offers superior performance metrics at a lower price point, making it the better investment. The gap in overall scores and the dramatic price difference make this a compelling choice unless you have particular requirements the RT95 specifically addresses.

Runner-up
Retevis RT95

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Absolute beginner on a tight budget

    Its low price point makes it an excellent, affordable starting radio for local contacts.

    UV-82HP
  • New operator needing dual-band capability

    The RT95 offers necessary dual-band functionality for expanding communication needs.

    Retevis RT95
  • Operator focused on basic local repeater access

    The UV-82HP provides sufficient power and features for basic VHF/UHF repeater use.

    UV-82HP
  • Home base station experimentation or mobile setup

    The higher channel count and dual-band nature suit base station and mobile experimentation.

    Retevis RT95
  • Budget-conscious user needing a secondary portable radio

    The UV-82HP is the best choice for a secondary, low-cost outdoor backup radio.

    UV-82HP

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-82HP

  • 64% cheaper ($50.00 vs $139.99)

Reasons to choose Retevis RT95

  • 56% more memory channels (200 vs 128)
  • Has color TFT display

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-82HPSpecRetevis RT95
$50.00
Price
$139.99
66
Overall Score
49
+35% for winner
7.00W
TX Power (High)
128
Memory Channels
200
+56% for winner
1800 mAh
Battery
Display
TFT Color
Covers GMRS only (Part 95E)
FCC Authorization
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
Black
color
Black
Black
Color
Black
8.4 Volts
Voltage
13.8 Volts
UHF, VHF
Tuner Type
Dual band
UV-82HP
Model Number
RT95
baofeng
Built-In Media
1 x RT95 Mobile radio, 1 x Power cable, 1 x Handheld mic, 1 x One pack of screw and accessories, 1 x User’s manual, 1 x Magnet Mount Antenna
UV-82HP
Mfr Part Number
FA9129A-J9129A-C9058A
-20F to 120 Degrees Fahrenheit
Temperature Range
-20-60 Degrees Celsius
[INF] Other two-way radios, walkie-talkies, or ham radios compatible with UHF and VHF frequencies, tuner technology, and power levels
Compatible Devices
Vehicle power supplies, microphones, external antennas, other two-way radios on the same frequency band
VOX Talk Around Mode, Battery Saver Mode
Additional Features
Dual Band, Dual Band Mobile Transceiver; Mobile Two Way Radio;Mobile Radio for RV Offroad 4x4, Emergency Alarm
1 year
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours
Waterproof
Water Resistance Level
Not Water Resistant
2.5"D x 7"W x 8.1"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
4.88"D x 6.42"W x 1.54"H

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-82HPPICK

$50.00 on Amazon

Retevis RT95

$139.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons