Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Baofeng UV-82HP vs Retevis RA89

The UV-82HP offers better value for the money with stronger specified transmit power at 7 watts versus the RA89's unknown output, plus a lower price and lighter weight. RadioRanked's composite score favors the Baofeng at 67 versus 53, reflecting better listed specifications relative to cost. However, the RA89 shows a marginally higher owner rating at 4.5 stars compared to 4.4 stars, though based on significantly fewer reviews (278 versus 4820), making the Baofeng's rating more statistically robust.

The single most important differentiator is transmit power. The UV-82HP's documented 7-watt output gives you confirmed capability for your dollar, while we lack the RA89's power specification entirely.

The UV-82HP suits budget-conscious operators who prioritize confirmed specs, lower weight, and established owner feedback at the lowest price point. The RA89 is worth considering only if you prefer a heavier radio and can accept missing transmit power data.

Buy the Baofeng UV-82HP. It costs less, delivers known performance, and RadioRanked's score gap reflects genuinely better listed specifications for the money. The owner ratings are too similar to override these concrete advantages.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious first-time licensee

    Costs less and offers a higher value rating for buyers watching their spending closely.

    UV-82HP
  • Weather-exposed ARES or RACES field operator

    Its IP68 rating and larger channel memory suit deployments in rain and dust.

    Retevis RA89
  • Hiker wanting a light handheld for summits

    At 214 grams it is noticeably lighter, which matters on long carries.

    UV-82HP
  • Operator needing a larger channel list

    Its 200 memory channels hold more repeater and simplex frequencies than the 128 offered.

    Retevis RA89
  • Secondary radio for casual repeater use

    Its 7 watt output and light weight suit everyday repeater access without extra bulk.

    UV-82HP

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-82HP

  • 81g lighter (214g vs 295g)
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Retevis RA89

  • 56% more memory channels (200 vs 128)
  • 39% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
  • IP68 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-82HPSpecRetevis RA89
53
Overall Score
49
+9% for winner
7.00W
TX Power (High)
—
128
Memory Channels
200
+56% for winner
214g
Weight
295g
+37% difference
1800 mAh
Battery
2500 mAh
+39% for winner
—
Display
LCD
—
IP Rating
IP68
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Black
Black
Color
Black
8.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
UHF, VHF
Tuner Type
dual band
UV-82HP
Model Number
RA89
baofeng
Built-In Media
1 x 2500mAh Li-ion Batteries, 1 x RA89 Two Way Radio, 1 x USB-C Charging Cable, Belt Clip, User Manual
-20F to 120 Degrees Fahrenheit
Temperature Range
-10-55 Degrees Celsius
[IPX4-]
Waterproof Rating
IP68
[INF] Other two-way radios, walkie-talkies, or ham radios compatible with UHF and VHF frequencies, tuner technology, and power levels
Compatible Devices
Dual Band (VHF, UHF) Two-Way Radios, 2Pin K Plug Accessories
VOX Talk Around Mode, Battery Saver Mode
Additional Features
Long Range, Rechargable, Noise Reduction, IP68 Waterproof, FM Radio, Type-C Charging, dual band ham radio; handheld radio; ham radio handheld; amateur radio; waterproof two way radio; walkie talkies long range
1 year
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours
2.5"D x 7"W x 8.1"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
1.69"D x 2.44"W x 4.96"H

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-82HPPICK

Search on Amazon

Retevis RA89

Search on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons