RadioRanked verdict
Updated Oct 2026Baofeng UV-82 vs Retevis A3
Our pick
Baofeng UV-82$24.99
The Baofeng UV-82 is the clear winner for most amateur radio users.
The single most important differentiator is value for money. The UV-82 costs $25 versus $108 for the Retevis A3, yet offers better listed specifications at a lower price. The UV-82 delivers known 8W transmission power and CHIRP compatibility for easy programming, while we lack the A3's TX power specification. Both radios share identical feature sets, lacking DMR, APRS, and GPS. The UV-82 weighs 20 grams less, a minor advantage in a handheld.
Owner feedback tells the real story. The UV-82 has a 4.4 out of 5 rating from 830 Amazon reviews, reflecting substantial real-world user experience. The A3 scores 3.6 from just 31 reviews, a much smaller sample that provides less reliable insight into typical ownership.
The UV-82 achieves a RadioRanked score of 70 versus 27 for the A3, reflecting significantly better specifications relative to its price point.
Buy the Baofeng UV-82 unless you have specific needs the A3 addresses that aren't apparent in these specs. Buy the Retevis A3 only if you've identified particular features or performance characteristics that justify the cost premium and accept the thinner owner feedback.
By use case
Which should you buy?
Absolute beginner on a tight budget
The UV-82 offers better features and a slightly higher beginner score for the price.
UV-82Operator needing maximum channel capacity
The A3's 999 channel memory is superior for monitoring multiple repeaters.
A3Portable camping and local monitoring
Its lower weight and higher portability score make it better for hiking and camping.
UV-82NOAA monitoring and basic repeater use
The A3 is specifically noted for its suitability in NOAA monitoring and basic repeater work.
A3Budget-conscious new technician starting out
The UV-82 provides a better overall feature set for a new, budget-minded operator.
UV-82
Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-82
- 77% cheaper ($24.99 vs $107.99)
- 12% more battery (2800 mAh vs 2500 mAh)
- 26g lighter (260g vs 286g)
- Has CHIRP compatibility
- IP54 water resistance
- FCC equipment authorization on file
Reasons to choose Retevis A3
- 8x more memory channels (999 vs 128)
Spec battle
Spec-by-spec breakdown
Made your choice?
Baofeng UV-82PICK
$24.99 on AmazonRetevis A3
$107.99 on AmazonKeep researching
Related Buying Guides
More head-to-heads

