RadioRanked verdict
Updated Nov 2026Baofeng UV-82 vs Retevis A3
Our pick
Retevis A3$109.99
The Baofeng UV-82 is the clear winner for most amateur radio users.
The single most important differentiator is value for money. The UV-82 costs $25 versus $108 for the Retevis A3, yet offers better listed specifications at a lower price. The UV-82 delivers known 8W transmission power and CHIRP compatibility for easy programming, while we lack the A3's TX power specification. Both radios share identical feature sets, lacking DMR, APRS, and GPS. The UV-82 weighs 20 grams less, a minor advantage in a handheld.
Owner feedback tells the real story. The UV-82 has a 4.4 out of 5 rating from 830 Amazon reviews, reflecting substantial real-world user experience. The A3 scores 3.6 from just 31 reviews, a much smaller sample that provides less reliable insight into typical ownership.
The UV-82 achieves a RadioRanked score of 70 versus 27 for the A3, reflecting significantly better specifications relative to its price point.
Buy the Baofeng UV-82 unless you have specific needs the A3 addresses that aren't apparent in these specs. Buy the Retevis A3 only if you've identified particular features or performance characteristics that justify the cost premium and accept the thinner owner feedback.
By use case
Which should you buy?
Budget-conscious first-time licensee
It costs far less than the alternative while covering the VHF and UHF bands a new Technician needs.
UV-82Buyer wanting a large channel list
It stores 999 channels, far more than the 128 on the Baofeng, for managing many repeaters and frequencies.
A3Operator needing 6m and NOAA access
It adds 6m coverage alongside VHF and UHF, plus NOAA weather monitoring that the Baofeng does not offer.
A3Local simplex and camping user
Its 5W output and low cost make it a practical choice for casual local simplex contacts.
UV-82Buyer prioritizing a higher feature score
It offers a higher feature score and broader band support, suiting users who want more capability for the money.
A3Weight-conscious hiker or portable operator
At 238 grams it is lighter than the 286 gram Retevis, easing carry on long outings.
UV-82
Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-82
- 48g lighter (238g vs 286g)
- Has CHIRP compatibility
- FCC equipment authorization on file
Reasons to choose Retevis A3
- 8x more memory channels (999 vs 128)
- 39% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
Spec battle
Spec-by-spec breakdown
Made your choice?
Baofeng UV-82PICK
Search on AmazonRetevis A3
$109.99 on AmazonKeep researching
Related Buying Guides
More head-to-heads

