Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Retevis HA1UV vs Yaesu FT-60R

Our pick

Retevis HA1UV$69.99

The Retevis HA1UV wins on price and value proposition. At $56 versus $210, the Retevis costs a quarter of the Yaesu's price. Both radios lack digital modes and GPS, both support CHIRP programming, and both weigh nearly the same. The Retevis carries an IP67 weather rating; the Yaesu lists none. Owners report 4.6 stars across 47 Retevis reviews and 4.5 stars across 212 Yaesu reviews, showing consistent satisfaction for both despite the large sample size difference.

The single most important differentiator is the $154 price gap with no meaningful specification advantage to the Yaesu. The Yaesu does offer 5W transmit power while the Retevis spec is unknown, but this alone does not justify four times the cost given identical feature sets otherwise.

Buy the Retevis HA1UV if you need a budget handheld that owners report performing well and can handle wet conditions. Buy the Yaesu FT-60R if you specifically need the confirmed 5W output or already use Yaesu equipment and value that ecosystem integration.

The Retevis HA1UV is the clear choice for most buyers seeking basic VHF/UHF capability at an entry-level price.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • First-time licensee starting on local repeaters

    Its beginner-friendly design and CHIRP programming support make it an easy first radio for new Technicians.

    HA1UV
  • Budget-conscious buyer wanting VHF and UHF coverage

    It costs much less than the alternative while still covering both VHF and UHF bands for local repeater use.

    HA1UV
  • Outdoor user needing a rugged handheld

    Its IP67 rating offers dust and water protection that suits rough field conditions well.

    HA1UV
  • Emergency preparedness buyer wanting a backup radio

    Its higher 5W transmit power and 1000-channel memory make it a dependable backup for search and rescue work.

    FT-60R
  • Operator who prefers simple analog radio

    It is a pure analog VHF and UHF radio with no digital modes to complicate routine repeater monitoring.

    FT-60R
  • Buyer prioritizing lighter carry weight

    At 337 grams it is lighter than the alternative, which helps during long days of portable operation.

    HA1UV

Reasons to choose Retevis HA1UV

  • 100% more battery (2800 mAh vs 1400 mAh)
  • 33g lighter (337g vs 370g)
  • Has color TFT display
  • IP67 water resistance

Reasons to choose Yaesu FT-60R

  • 4x more memory channels (1,000 vs 256)
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Retevis HA1UVSpecYaesu FT-60R
$69.99
Price
—
59
Overall Score
45
+32% for winner
—
TX Power (High)
5.00W
256
Memory Channels
1000
3.8× difference
337g
Weight
370g
+10% difference
2800 mAh
Battery
1400 mAh
2.0× difference
Color LCD
Display
—
IP67
IP Rating
—
No grant found
FCC Authorization
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
Black
color
Black
Black
Color
Black
U/V band
Tuner Type
UHF, VHF
HA1UV
Model Number
FT-60R
1 x 2800mAh lithium_ion battery, 1 x Belt clip & Hand strap, 1 x Data cable, 1 x HA1UV two way radio, 1 x Type-C charging cable & Charging base
Built-In Media
1400mA Battery, Charger, antenna, belt clip
U/V band
Frequency Range
144 - 148 MHz
FA9244B-J9131P-C9034A
Mfr Part Number
FT-60R
Repeater, Speaker, two way radio with the same frequency and the same CTCSS/DCS
Compatible Devices
MH-37A4B, MH-34B4B, E-DC-5B, EDC-6, CT-44, FBA-25A
Handheld Ham Radio with Cable;IP67 waterproof;NOAA Weather Receiver;Type-C Rechargeable;VFO
Additional Features
Weather Alert
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours
Warranty Description
3 Years

Made your choice?

Retevis HA1UVPICK

$69.99 on Amazon

Yaesu FT-60R

Search on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons