Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Radtel RT-910B vs Retevis RA89

Our pick

Radtel RT-910B$30.99

The Retevis RA89 is the better choice for most buyers. Both radios lack digital mode support and advanced features, with nearly identical specs. The decisive factor is owner feedback: the RA89 has a 4.5 out of 5 rating from 278 Amazon reviews, compared to the RT-910B's 3.9 out of 5 from 48 reviews. That larger sample size and higher rating suggest owners report better satisfaction with the RA89. The RA89 also lists an IP68 rating, meaning owners have weather protection documentation for that model. The price difference is $36, which is modest given the stronger owner endorsement. The RT-910B costs less and might appeal to budget-conscious buyers willing to accept less owner feedback, but you're trading price savings for uncertainty. The RA89 gives you proven owner satisfaction and weather resistance claims. Buy the RA89 unless you need to minimize upfront cost. Choose the RT-910B only if budget is your absolute priority and you accept less documented owner experience.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious buyer wanting the lowest entry cost

    Costs considerably less while offering 960 memory channels, a 6m band, and Bluetooth.

    RT-910B
  • Emergency communications volunteer on ARES or RACES

    The IP68 rating and ARES/RACES suitability make it the sturdier choice in bad weather.

    Retevis RA89
  • First-time licensee needing a guided starter radio

    Its stronger beginner-friendliness and simpler 200-channel layout suit a first handheld well.

    Retevis RA89
  • Club managing several networks with many channels

    Its 960-channel memory holds far more repeaters and simplex frequencies than a 200-channel radio.

    RT-910B
  • Portable operator carrying a lighter handheld on hikes

    At 280 grams, it is slightly lighter than the other radio's 295 grams for long activations.

    RT-910B

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-910B

  • 5x more memory channels (960 vs 200)
  • 15g lighter (280g vs 295g)
  • Has Bluetooth

Reasons to choose Retevis RA89

  • 67% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1500 mAh)
  • IP68 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Radtel RT-910BSpecRetevis RA89
$30.99
Price
—
59
Overall Score
49
+20% for winner
960
Memory Channels
200
4.8× difference
280g
Weight
295g
+5% difference
1500 mAh
Battery
2500 mAh
+67% for winner
—
Display
LCD
—
IP Rating
IP68
No grant found
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Standard
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Standard
Color
Black
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
UHF/VHF
Tuner Type
dual band
RT-910B
Model Number
RA89
30 Decibels
Audible Noise
40 Decibels
1x RT-910B Main unit, 1x 1500mAh Li-ion Battery,1x Dual band antenna,1x Belt Clip, 1x Type C charging Cable,1x Power supple with USB port,1x English User Manual
Built-In Media
1 x 2500mAh Li-ion Batteries, 1 x RA89 Two Way Radio, 1 x USB-C Charging Cable, Belt Clip, User Manual
144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz
Frequency Range
144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz
Bluetooth-enabled devices, other two-way radios on 144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz frequencies
Compatible Devices
Dual Band (VHF, UHF) Two-Way Radios, 2Pin K Plug Accessories
Bluetooth Programmable, Type-c,AM/FM Reception,Spectrum, VOX Hands Free Handheld Radio
Additional Features
Long Range, Rechargable, Noise Reduction, IP68 Waterproof, FM Radio, Type-C Charging, dual band ham radio; handheld radio; ham radio handheld; amateur radio; waterproof two way radio; walkie talkies long range
1 Year
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours
1.57"D x 2"W x 10.62"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
1.69"D x 2.44"W x 4.96"H

Made your choice?

Radtel RT-910BPICK

$30.99 on Amazon

Retevis RA89

Search on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons