Icom IC-2300H vs Yaesu FTM-300DR

The Yaesu FTM-300DR is the clear winner here, scoring 69/100 versus the Icom's 42/100. While the IC-2300H delivers more raw power at 65W, that advantage is overshadowed by the FTM-300DR's superior feature set and overall functionality.

The single most important differentiator is the FTM-300DR's integrated GPS and APRS capability. These features enable position tracking and emergency location reporting, which the Icom completely lacks. In modern amateur radio, especially for mobile operations, this functionality gap is substantial. The FTM-300DR's higher overall score reflects this practical advantage despite its 15W lower output.

The IC-2300H appeals to budget-conscious operators who prioritize maximum transmit power and CHIRP programmability for simple frequency management, though its basic feature set limits its usefulness. The FTM-300DR suits operators wanting a well-rounded mobile platform with emergency location capability and APRS connectivity for net operations and experimentation.

Buy the Yaesu FTM-300DR. The higher score, GPS integration, and APRS support justify the modest power sacrifice. Unless your specific use case demands maximum power output and nothing else matters, the Icom doesn't offer enough to compete in this comparison.