Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band vs Retevis HA1UV

Our pick

Retevis HA1UV$69.99

The Baofeng K5 Plus is the clear winner in this matchup. Despite both radios lacking advanced features like DMR, APRS, and GPS, the K5 Plus delivers superior value across the board.

The most important differentiator is price combined with power output. The K5 Plus costs $26 with confirmed 10W transmission power, while the Retevis HA1UV nearly doubles the price at $57 with unspecified output. The K5 Plus also scores five points higher overall at 68 versus 63, suggesting better real-world performance across multiple categories.

The Baofeng K5 Plus is ideal for beginners and budget-conscious operators who want a capable tri-band radio without breaking the bank. The Retevis HA1UV makes sense only if you specifically value Retevis's brand reputation or have had positive experiences with their support network, though the specs don't justify the premium here.

Buy the Baofeng K5 Plus. It offers more power, lower cost, and a higher review score. Unless you have specific reasons to prefer Retevis, spending an extra $31 for inferior specifications makes no financial sense for amateur radio hobbyists.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-focused buyer starting with a first handheld

    Costs less and offers more memory channels and higher transmit power for the money.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
  • Outdoor user needing dust and water resistance

    The IP67 rating lets it handle dust and temporary submersion, which the Baofeng does not advertise.

    HA1UV
  • New Technician focused on local repeater use

    It scores higher for beginners and keeps the focus on VHF and UHF repeater use.

    HA1UV
  • Emergency preparedness buyer wanting many channels

    Its 999 memory channels and 1.25m band coverage give more options for public service or temporary needs.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band
  • Backpacker prioritizing the lightest handheld

    At 290 grams it weighs noticeably less than the 337 gram Retevis, easing long carries.

    Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

Reasons to choose Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

  • 4x more memory channels (999 vs 256)
  • 47g lighter (290g vs 337g)
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Retevis HA1UV

  • 12% more battery (2800 mAh vs 2500 mAh)
  • Has color TFT display
  • IP67 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-BandSpecRetevis HA1UV
—
Price
$69.99
51
Overall Score
59
+16% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
—
999
Memory Channels
256
3.8× difference
290g
Weight
337g
+16% difference
2500 mAh
Battery
2800 mAh
+12% for winner
—
Display
Color LCD
—
IP Rating
IP67
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Black
K5PLUS
Model Number
HA1UV
2500mAh Battery x 1, BAOFENG K5PLUS Two Way Radio x 1, Earpice x 1; Belt Clip x 1; Lanyard x 1, Speaker Mic x 1; USB-C Charging Cable x 1, Standard ANT x 1; Long ANT x 1
Built-In Media
1 x 2800mAh lithium_ion battery, 1 x Belt clip & Hand strap, 1 x Data cable, 1 x HA1UV two way radio, 1 x Type-C charging cable & Charging base
UHF VHF 1.25M
Frequency Range
U/V band
CHIRP software, Earpiece, Standard antenna
Compatible Devices
Repeater, Speaker, two way radio with the same frequency and the same CTCSS/DCS
Channel Clone, Digital Display, Long Range, USB-C Rechargable, Voice Operated Transmission
Additional Features
Handheld Ham Radio with Cable;IP67 waterproof;NOAA Weather Receiver;Type-C Rechargeable;VFO
18 Months Warranty
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours

Made your choice?

Baofeng K5 Plus Tri-Band

Search on Amazon

Retevis HA1UVPICK

$69.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons