Retevis A3 vs Retevis HA1UV

The HA1UV is the better choice for most users. Both radios share identical core features—no DMR, APRS, or GPS—so the decision hinges on value and user experience. The HA1UV costs $38 less, offers CHIRP programming support (making frequency management easier), and delivers significantly better reported owner satisfaction at 4.6/5 stars versus 3.6/5. RadioRanked's composite score reflects this advantage: the HA1UV scores 59/100 compared to the A3's 27/100, indicating better specifications relative to price. The A3 is slightly lighter at 286g versus 337g, though we lack transmit power figures for both radios.

The most important differentiator is owner satisfaction combined with CHIRP compatibility, which gives the HA1UV a practical edge for programming and maintenance.

The HA1UV suits budget-conscious operators who value community feedback and ease of use. The A3 might appeal only to those specifically prioritizing minimal weight, though the 51-gram difference is modest and shouldn't drive the decision alone.

Get the HA1UV. It offers better value, higher reported satisfaction, useful CHIRP support, and costs less—there's no compelling reason to choose the A3.