Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Radtel RT-860 vs Retevis RA79

Our pick

Retevis RA79$23.99

The Retevis RA79 is the clear winner here. While both radios lack advanced features like DMR, APRS, and GPS, the RA79 demonstrates superior overall value through its lower price point and notably higher performance score of 60 versus the RT-860's 48.

The single most important differentiator is CHIRP compatibility. The RA79's support for this widely-used programming software gives it a significant practical advantage, making frequency management and customization far simpler for users. The RT-860's lack of CHIRP support forces manual programming, which is tedious and error-prone. This alone justifies choosing the RA79.

Both radios are budget options with sparse specifications—missing critical details like transmit power and weight. However, the RA79's broader feature set and proven compatibility make it the more functional choice. The RT-860 appears to be a dead-end purchase with limited ecosystem support.

Buy the RA79 if you want a budget-friendly handheld with practical usability and CHIRP support. Buy the RT-860 only if you have very specific legacy requirements or can tolerate manual programming exclusively.

For most amateur radio operators, the Retevis RA79 is the obvious choice at a lower price with substantially better capabilities.

Runner-up
Radtel RT-860

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Beginner exploring multiple bands

    The RA79 offers multi-band capability and a higher beginner score for general use.

    RA79
  • Advanced local repeater operations

    The RT-860's high channel memory is ideal for managing complex local repeater setups.

    RT-860
  • Highly budget-constrained first-time buyer

    While both are cheap, the RA79 offers better overall features for the price.

    RA79
  • Operator needing basic analog VHF/UHF only

    The RT-860's specialized analog focus makes it perfect for simple, reliable local comms.

    RT-860
  • Portable field use and general communication

    The RA79's multi-band receive and high beginner score make it versatile for field trips.

    RA79

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-860

  • 5x more memory channels (1,024 vs 200)
  • 43% more battery (2000 mAh vs 1400 mAh)

Reasons to choose Retevis RA79

  • 38% cheaper ($23.99 vs $39.00)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Radtel RT-860SpecRetevis RA79
$39.00
Price
$23.99
45
Overall Score
61
+35% for winner
1024
Memory Channels
200
5.0× difference
2000 mAh
Battery
1400 mAh
+43% for winner
No grant found
FCC Authorization
No grant found
With SW/MW Antennas
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
With SW/MW Antennas
Color
Black
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
UHF VHF AM USB LSB CW CB LW MW SW SSB Reception,
Tuner Type
[POSSIBLY] Digital
RT-860
Model Number
RA79
1x RT-860 Main unit, 1x 2000mAh Li-ion Battery,1x Dual band antenna,1X Desktop charger, 1x lanyard, 1x Belt Clip, 1x Type C charging Cable,1x Power supple with USB port,1x English User Manual
Built-In Media
1 x USB Desktop Charger, 1x RA79 Radio Body & Antenna, Battery, Belt Clip, User Manual
144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz
Frequency Range
Dual Band
External antennas (50 ohm)
Compatible Devices
[Wide range of CHIRP-compatible devices]
1024 Channels,Type-C and Desktop Charger, AM USB LSB CW CB LW MW SW SSB Reception
Additional Features
Emergency Alarm, Frequency copy, Lightweight, Long Range, Weather Alert
1 Year
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours
Not Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Not Water Resistant
1.18"D x 2.36"W x 4.72"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
1.48"D x 2.36"W x 4.53"H

Made your choice?

Radtel RT-860

$39.00 on Amazon

Retevis RA79PICK

$23.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons