RadioRanked verdict
Updated Oct 2026Radtel RT-860 vs Retevis A3
Our pick
Radtel RT-860$39.00
The Radtel RT-860 is the clear winner here. Both radios share identical feature sets, lacking DMR, APRS, GPS, and CHIRP support, with neither listing IP ratings or transmit power specs. The single most important differentiator is price combined with owner feedback. The RT-860 costs $39 versus $108 for the Retevis A3, while owners report stronger satisfaction with the RT-860 at 3.9 out of 5 stars across 139 reviews compared to the A3's 3.6 stars from just 31 reviews. The RT-860 is also lighter at 255 grams. The A3 offers no compensating advantages to justify its nearly threefold price premium.
Buy the Radtel RT-860 if you need an affordable entry-level handheld with solid owner-reported satisfaction. Buy the Retevis A3 only if you have specific requirements this comparison doesn't capture, since the RT-860 delivers better value across every comparable metric.
For most buyers seeking a budget handheld, the RT-860 is the logical choice.
By use case
Which should you buy?
Budget-focused new ham radio licensee
The Radtel offers superior channel memory and is cheaper for basic operations.
RT-860Operator needing basic multi-band coverage
The Retevis A3 provides slightly better portability and general multi-band capability.
A3Advanced local repeater and simplex use
Its higher channel memory makes it ideal for managing many local repeater inputs.
RT-860Beginner focusing on NOAA monitoring
The Retevis A3 is specifically mentioned for NOAA monitoring and general use.
A3Technician prioritizing maximum channel capacity
The Radtel's 1024 channel memory is superior for high-density frequency lists.
RT-860
Reasons to choose Radtel RT-860
- 64% cheaper ($39.00 vs $107.99)
- 3% more memory channels (1,024 vs 999)
- 31g lighter (255g vs 286g)
Reasons to choose Retevis A3
- 25% more battery (2500 mAh vs 2000 mAh)
Spec battle
Spec-by-spec breakdown
Made your choice?
Radtel RT-860PICK
$39.00 on AmazonRetevis A3
$107.99 on AmazonMore head-to-heads

