Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Radtel RT-470X vs Retevis RT85

Our pick

Radtel RT-470X$32.99

The Radtel RT-470X edges out the Retevis RT85 despite nearly identical feature sets. Both radios lack digital modes and GPS capability, making them straightforward analog handhelds suitable for basic VHF/UHF communication. Both support CHIRP programming, which is essential for enthusiasts managing multiple frequencies.

The single most important differentiator is price. At $26 versus $50, the RT-470X costs half as much while actually scoring 2 points higher overall. The RT85's only concrete advantage is its specified 5W transmit power, but without knowing the RT-470X's output, you cannot definitively say one outperforms the other on the critical metric of range.

The RT-470X makes sense for operators on tight budgets who want a reliable second radio or backup unit without sacrificing core functionality. The RT85 targets buyers willing to pay premium pricing for a known quantity with published specifications and presumably better build quality or warranty support.

Buy the Radtel RT-470X if price and value matter most. Choose the Retevis RT85 if you need confirmed power output specifications and prefer an established brand with customer support. Given the marginal score difference and significant price gap, the RT-470X represents better value for most amateur operators.

Runner-up
Retevis RT85

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Absolute beginner starting HAM radio

    The RT-470X's higher beginner score and multi-band receiver make it easier to learn.

    RT-470X
  • Budget-conscious POTA/SOTA field use

    The RT85 offers sufficient power and portability for general outdoor field operations.

    Retevis RT85
  • Operator needing maximum receiver flexibility

    The RT-470X's multi-band receiver capability provides superior reception options.

    RT-470X
  • Casual local simplex communication

    Its optimized features and high beginner score make it ideal for local, simple operations.

    RT-470X
  • User prioritizing simple, reliable local repeater access

    The RT85's focus on local coverage and reliable operation suits casual repeater use.

    Retevis RT85

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-470X

  • 6% cheaper ($32.99 vs $34.99)
  • 28% more memory channels (256 vs 200)
  • Has color TFT display
  • IP54 water resistance

Reasons to choose Retevis RT85

  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Radtel RT-470XSpecRetevis RT85
$32.99
Price
$34.99
66
Overall Score
65
+2% for winner
TX Power (High)
5.00W
256
Memory Channels
200
+28% for winner
2800 mAh
Battery
1.77in TFT Color
Display
LCD
IP54
IP Rating
No grant found
FCC Authorization
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
Standard
color
Black
Standard
Color
Black
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
FM/AM
Tuner Type
RT85
448 Grams
Item Weight
0.5 Pounds
RT-470X
Model Number
FA9195AX2
1x Radtel RT-470X Ham Radio,1x 2800mAh Type-C Battery, 1x 7.87-inch Dual Band 145/435 Antenna, 1x 39-inch USB-C Charger Cable, 1x Belt Clip with Metal Piece, 1x English User Manual,1x AC Power Adapter with USB Port (FCC ID: 2AZSA-RT470X)
Built-In Media
2 x Retevis RT85 two-way radio, 2 x battery, 2 x antenna, 2 x charger, 2 x user manual, 2 x sling
144-148/420-450Mhz
Frequency Range
Analog
RT-470X
Mfr Part Number
FA9195AX2
K-connector
Compatible Devices
Radio
Air band RX, Chirp Programming, Multi-band TX/RX, Type-C Charger, Wireless Copy frequency
Additional Features
LCD display, dual band and dual display
8 Hours
Battery Average Life
12 Hours
1 Year Warranty
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours

Made your choice?

Radtel RT-470XPICK

$32.99 on Amazon

Retevis RT85

$34.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons