Comet SS-460SBNMO Dual-Band Mobile vs Midland MXTA26 6dB Gain Whip

The Midland MXTA26 is the clear winner here, but context matters.

The single most important difference is electrical length. The SS-460 attempts to cover two bands with a compromise design: its VHF performance is genuinely weak at quarter-wave, while its UHF section reaches a respectable 5/8 wavelength. The Midland commits fully to GMRS with a multi-wavelength design that delivers realistic 4.9 dBi performance across its intended band. The Midland's claimed 6 dBi gain is supported by its physical length, whereas the SS-460's 3.8 dBi claim is generous marketing for what actually amounts to dual-band compromise.

The MXTA26 costs 27 percent more, but you get a longer antenna with better real-world performance on its dedicated frequency. The SS-460 makes sense only if you genuinely need both VHF and UHF from one mount and can accept weaker VHF results.

Buy the SS-460 if you operate split bands and value compact convenience over peak performance. Buy the Midland if GMRS is your primary use and you want legitimate gain without inflated claims.

The Midland MXTA26 is the stronger choice for most operators.