Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Comet CH-32 (BNC) vs Diamond RH77CA (BNC)

Our pick

Diamond RH77CA (BNC)$24.99

The Diamond RH77CA is the clear winner here. It delivers genuinely useful performance where it matters most.

The critical difference is electrical length. The RH77CA reaches half-wave efficiency on UHF at 435 MHz, achieving a realistic 2.8 dBi gain. The CH-32 remains severely compromised on both bands, delivering -9.0 dBi on VHF and -5.3 dBi on UHF due to its stubby 44 mm length. On a handheld radio, that gap translates directly to noticeably weaker reception and transmission. The RH77CA's 381 mm length is engineered specifically for this, while the CH-32 appears optimized for compactness rather than performance.

The RH77CA also undercuts the Comet on price by fourteen dollars while substantially outperforming it. Its flexible construction is practical for field use without sacrificing the electrical properties that matter.

The Comet CH-32 might appeal only to users whose primary concern is pocket portability over actual communication effectiveness, though even then, the RH77CA's modest 381 mm length isn't prohibitive for most applications.

Buy the Diamond RH77CA unless you absolutely cannot tolerate anything longer than 44 mm. For everyone else, it's the only sensible choice between these two.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Seeking maximum portability and minimal bulk

    Its extremely short physical length makes it ideal for daily carry.

    CH-32
  • Upgrading from a stock rubber ducky antenna

    The name brand and better electrical performance provide a noticeable quality upgrade.

    RH77CA
  • Budget-conscious buyer needing basic VHF coverage

    It is significantly cheaper than the Comet while offering superior RF performance.

    RH77CA
  • Dedicated scanner enthusiast prioritizing size

    The comet's design specifically targets those who need the smallest possible stub.

    CH-32
  • Operator needing reliable, moderate range performance

    Its optimized electrical length provides better signal strength than the Comet.

    RH77CA

Reasons to choose Comet CH-32 (BNC)

  • 13.3 in shorter to carry (44 mm vs 381 mm)

Reasons to choose Diamond RH77CA (BNC)

  • 36% cheaper ($24.99 vs $38.99)
  • Stronger on VHF (-1.1 dBi vs -9.0 dBi at 146 MHz)
  • Stronger on UHF (2.8 dBi vs -5.3 dBi at 435 MHz)
  • Flexible, so it survives being bent

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Comet CH-32 (BNC)SpecDiamond RH77CA (BNC)
$38.99
Price
$24.99
44 mm
Length
381 mm
0.02 λ, electrically short
On VHF (146 MHz)
0.19 λ, electrically short
0.06 λ, electrically short
On UHF (435 MHz)
0.55 λ, half wave
Claimed gain
2.15 dBi
Is that claim credible?
Supported by its length
BNC
Connector
BNC
whip
Type
whip
No
Flexible
Yes
35
Overall Score
82
2.3× difference
Compact, Small
size
Small
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
0

Made your choice?

Comet CH-32 (BNC)

$38.99 on Amazon

Diamond RH77CA (BNC)PICK

$24.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons