Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Sep 2026

Comet CH-32 (BNC) vs Diamond RH77CA (BNC)

Our pick

Diamond RH77CA (BNC)$24.99

The Diamond RH77CA is the clear winner here. The single most important difference is electrical length: at UHF, the Diamond reaches half-wave efficiency at 0.55 wavelengths with realistic gain of 2.8 dBi, while the Comet is severely compromised at only 0.06 wavelengths with -5.3 dBi. On VHF both antennas are electrically short, but the Diamond's 0.19 wavelengths is less crippled than the Comet's 0.02 wavelengths. The Comet's tiny 44 mm form factor makes it genuinely pocketable, but that advantage disappears the moment you need actual performance.

The Diamond costs six dollars less, has more than three times the review count from owners, and owners report slightly higher satisfaction. Critically, its 381 mm length is still portable on a handheld despite the dramatic performance improvement.

Buy the Comet only if pocket size absolutely trumps performance and you operate primarily on VHF where both are weak. Buy the Diamond if you actually want the antenna to work, especially on UHF where it functions as a proper half-wave radiator.

Get the Diamond RH77CA. It outperforms significantly, costs less, and owners prefer it.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Seeking maximum portability and minimal bulk

    Its extremely short physical length makes it ideal for daily carry.

    CH-32
  • Upgrading from a stock rubber ducky antenna

    The name brand and better electrical performance provide a noticeable quality upgrade.

    RH77CA
  • Budget-conscious buyer needing basic VHF coverage

    It is significantly cheaper than the Comet while offering superior RF performance.

    RH77CA
  • Dedicated scanner enthusiast prioritizing size

    The comet's design specifically targets those who need the smallest possible stub.

    CH-32
  • Operator needing reliable, moderate range performance

    Its optimized electrical length provides better signal strength than the Comet.

    RH77CA

Reasons to choose Comet CH-32 (BNC)

  • 13.3 in shorter to carry (44 mm vs 381 mm)

Reasons to choose Diamond RH77CA (BNC)

  • 36% cheaper ($24.99 vs $38.99)
  • Stronger on VHF (-1.1 dBi vs -9.0 dBi at 146 MHz)
  • Stronger on UHF (2.8 dBi vs -5.3 dBi at 435 MHz)
  • Flexible, so it survives being bent

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Comet CH-32 (BNC)SpecDiamond RH77CA (BNC)
$38.99
Price
$24.99
44 mm
Length
381 mm
0.02 λ, electrically short
On VHF (146 MHz)
0.19 λ, electrically short
0.06 λ, electrically short
On UHF (435 MHz)
0.55 λ, half wave
—
Claimed gain
2.15 dBi
—
Is that claim credible?
Supported by its length
BNC
Connector
BNC
whip
Type
whip
No
Flexible
Yes
35
Overall Score
79
2.3× difference
Compact, Small
size
Small
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
0

Made your choice?

Comet CH-32 (BNC)

$38.99 on Amazon

Diamond RH77CA (BNC)PICK

$24.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons