Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

BTECH UV-PRO vs Radtel RT-860

Our pick

BTECH UV-PRO$197.89

The UV-PRO is the clear winner for anyone who needs navigation or position tracking. The single most important differentiator is that the UV-PRO includes GPS and APRS capability, making it suitable for outdoor activities and emergency coordination, while the RT-860 lacks these features entirely.

The UV-PRO costs $165 and owners report a 4.3 out of 5 rating across 367 reviews. It weighs 312 grams, carries an IP67 waterproof rating, and delivers the features that justify its price for users who need more than basic communication. The RT-860 costs $39, weighs 255 grams, and owners report a 3.9 out of 5 rating from 139 reviews. We do not have transmit power figures for either radio, and the RT-860 has no listed IP rating.

The UV-PRO is the right choice if you plan to use GPS location features, navigate outdoors, or participate in emergency nets where position reporting matters. The RT-860 suits budget-conscious users who need a lightweight backup radio for straightforward voice communication in casual settings.

Choose the UV-PRO unless cost is your only concern. The additional $126 investment buys navigation capability and better-reported owner satisfaction that the RT-860 simply cannot match.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious new technicians

    It costs considerably less, which makes it a low-risk first radio for learning local repeater use.

    RT-860
  • Operators needing high channel memory

    Its 1024-channel memory holds far more programmed frequencies than the 180 channels on the other radio.

    RT-860
  • Emergency communications volunteers on ARES or RACES

    Its APRS and GPS support enable position reporting, which suits activations and coordinated field work.

    UV-PRO
  • Trail users and outdoor deployments

    Its IP67 rating protects it from dust and water, making it better suited to harsh outdoor conditions.

    UV-PRO
  • Weight-focused hikers and backpackers

    At 255 grams it is lighter than the 312-gram alternative, reducing load on long days afield.

    RT-860
  • Licensed technicians upgrading from basic handhelds

    Bluetooth, GPS, and APRS add capabilities that a basic analog handheld cannot offer.

    UV-PRO

Reasons to choose BTECH UV-PRO

  • 30% more battery (2600 mAh vs 2000 mAh)
  • Has APRS support
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • IP67 water resistance
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-860

  • 81% cheaper ($36.99 vs $197.89)
  • 6x more memory channels (1,024 vs 180)
  • 57g lighter (255g vs 312g)

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

BTECH UV-PROSpecRadtel RT-860
$197.89
Price
$36.99
63
Overall Score
45
+41% for winner
180
Memory Channels
1024
5.6× difference
312g
Weight
255g
+22% difference
2600 mAh
Battery
2000 mAh
+30% for winner
IP67
IP Rating
—
Covers land mobile only (Part 90)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
With SW/MW Antennas
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
With SW/MW Antennas
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts
VHF/UHF
Tuner Type
UHF VHF AM USB LSB CW CB LW MW SW SSB Reception,
UV-PRO
Model Number
RT-860
UV-PRO Radio, 2600mAh Battery, USB-C to USB Charging Cable, Belt Clip, Screws, Screwdriver, User Manual
Built-In Media
1x RT-860 Main unit, 1x 2000mAh Li-ion Battery,1x Dual band antenna,1X Desktop charger, 1x lanyard, 1x Belt Clip, 1x Type C charging Cable,1x Power supple with USB port,1x English User Manual
Aviation RX, FM RX, UHF, VHF
Frequency Range
144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz
GMRS-PRO
Mfr Part Number
RT-860
Android, iPhone
Compatible Devices
External antennas (50 ohm)
Dual Band, Dust Proof, Long Range, Submersible, Voice Operated Transmission
Additional Features
1024 Channels,Type-C and Desktop Charger, AM USB LSB CW CB LW MW SW SSB Reception
1 year for products purchased through BaoFengTech.com
Warranty Description
1 Year
3"D x 3"W x 11"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
1.18"D x 2.36"W x 4.72"H

Made your choice?

BTECH UV-PROPICK

$197.89 on Amazon

Radtel RT-860

$36.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons