RadioRanked verdict
Updated Nov 2026BTECH UV-5X3 vs Retevis RA79
Our pick
Retevis RA79$34.99
The Retevis RA79 is the clear winner here. For the price difference alone, you're getting superior value with the RA79 at half the cost of the UV-5X3, and it actually outperforms in overall scoring by 17 points. The single most important differentiator is CHIRP compatibility on the RA79, which means you can program frequencies on your computer rather than wrestling with the radio's interface. This is a genuine practical advantage that matters for frequent users.
The UV-5X3 might appeal to someone seeking a recognizable brand name despite paying more for a lower-rated product, but that's not a compelling reason. The RA79 delivers better value, better programmability, and better independent scores across the board.
Buy the RA79 if you want a capable handheld that won't break the bank and respects your time with computer programming support. Skip the UV-5X3 unless you have specific requirements not reflected here that justify the premium price and lower score.
We recommend the Retevis RA79 without reservation as the better purchase for most amateur operators.
By use case
Which should you buy?
Budget-conscious first-time licensee
Costs less and rates higher for beginners, making it the safer first purchase.
RA79Operators scanning across many stored frequencies
Holds 200 memory channels, more than the BTECH's 128, for busier channel lists.
RA79Emergency preparedness kit builders
Offers more channels and a higher features rating for a stored, ready-to-program kit.
RA79Hikers prioritizing a portability rating
Its slightly better portability rating suits pack-carried use, despite fewer memory channels.
UV-5X3
Reasons to choose BTECH UV-5X3
- 7% more battery (1500 mAh vs 1400 mAh)
- FCC equipment authorization on file
Reasons to choose Retevis RA79
- 56% more memory channels (200 vs 128)
- 2g lighter (225g vs 227g)
Spec battle
Spec-by-spec breakdown
Made your choice?
BTECH UV-5X3
Search on AmazonRetevis RA79PICK
$34.99 on AmazonMore head-to-heads

