Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Oct 2026

Baofeng UV-5RM Plus vs Retevis HA1UV

Our pick

Baofeng UV-5RM Plus$59.99

The UV-5RM Plus is the better choice for most buyers. The single most important differentiator is price paired with transmit power: the Baofeng costs $10 less and publishes a confirmed 10W output, while the Retevis spec sheet omits its TX power entirely, leaving that critical performance figure unknown.

Both radios share the same owner ratings (4.6/5 stars) and core features like CHIRP support and no DMR or APRS. The Retevis adds an IP67 weather rating, which matters if you operate in wet conditions, but the UV-5RM Plus is lighter by 47 grams. The Baofeng's higher overall score reflects better value across price, published specs, and the larger review sample (352 versus 47 owners reporting).

The UV-5RM Plus should appeal to budget-conscious operators who want confirmed transmit power and proven user feedback at a lower entry price. The Retevis makes sense if weather sealing is a genuine operational requirement and you are comfortable with unspecified transmit output.

Buy the Baofeng UV-5RM Plus unless you specifically need the IP67 rating for wet-environment work.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • New license holder needing basic features

    Its higher channel count and better value make it ideal for beginners.

    UV-5RM Plus
  • Operator needing extreme weather durability

    The IP67 rating ensures reliable performance in harsh outdoor environments.

    HA1UV
  • Budget-conscious field team for monitoring

    The superior transmit power offers better range for local monitoring tasks.

    UV-5RM Plus
  • Ham radio beginner focusing on portability and ease

    Its robust build and beginner-friendly design make it perfect for starting out.

    HA1UV
  • Emergency preparedness or field communications

    The higher power output is beneficial for maintaining communication links over distance.

    UV-5RM Plus

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-5RM Plus

  • 14% cheaper ($59.99 vs $69.99)
  • 4x more memory channels (999 vs 256)
  • 47g lighter (290g vs 337g)
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Retevis HA1UV

  • 56% more battery (2800 mAh vs 1800 mAh)
  • IP67 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-5RM PlusSpecRetevis HA1UV
$59.99
Price
$69.99
71
Overall Score
59
+20% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
—
999
Memory Channels
256
3.8× difference
290g
Weight
337g
+16% difference
1800 mAh
Battery
2800 mAh
+56% for winner
Color LCD
Display
Color LCD
—
IP Rating
IP67
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Black
2
unitCount
1
Black 2Pack Full Kit
Color
Black
7.4 Volts
Voltage
7.4 Volts (DC)
UHF VHF
Tuner Type
U/V band
UV-5RM
Model Number
HA1UV
2×UV-5RM radio, 1×Programming Cable, 2×Earpieces, 2×Speaker Mic, 2×Tactical antennas, 2×Original antenna, 2×Charging base, 2×USB-C charging cables, 2×2500mAh battery, 2×belt clip, 2×Hand strap, 1×Instruction manual
Built-In Media
1 x 2800mAh lithium_ion battery, 1 x Belt clip & Hand strap, 1 x Data cable, 1 x HA1UV two way radio, 1 x Type-C charging cable & Charging base
136-512 MHz
Frequency Range
U/V band
Programming Cable, Speaker Mic, Tactical Antenna, Earphones, Weather Radios
Compatible Devices
Repeater, Speaker, two way radio with the same frequency and the same CTCSS/DCS
Copy Frequency, NOAA Weather Receiver, Tactical Antenna, Type C Charging
Additional Features
Handheld Ham Radio with Cable;IP67 waterproof;NOAA Weather Receiver;Type-C Rechargeable;VFO
1 Year
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-5RM PlusPICK

$59.99 on Amazon

Retevis HA1UV

$69.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons