Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Oct 2026

Baofeng UV-28 vs Retevis HA1UV

Our pick

Baofeng UV-28$58.99

The UV-28 is the better choice for most buyers. It costs $37 less while offering 10W of transmit power, where the HA1UV's power is unknown. Both support CHIRP programming and lack DMR or APRS, but the UV-28 includes GPS for location tracking while the HA1UV does not. The HA1UV weighs slightly less and has an IP67 rating for weather resistance, but the UV-28 is still reasonably portable at 360g.

The single most important differentiator is price combined with the known transmit power. The UV-28 delivers a clear specification advantage at a significant discount.

The UV-28 suits users who prioritize value, want confirmed 10W power output, and appreciate GPS capability. The HA1UV makes sense only if you absolutely need IP67 weather sealing and don't mind paying more for an unknown power specification.

Buy the Baofeng UV-28. It offers better value, concrete specifications, and GPS features that the HA1UV lacks. Owners report strong satisfaction with both radios, but the UV-28's combination of lower price, known power output, and additional GPS function makes it the stronger recommendation unless you work in harsh wet environments where the HA1UV's IP rating is essential.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • First-time beginner needing ease of use

    Its higher beginner score and IP67 rating make it ideal for new operators.

    HA1UV
  • Budget-focused SOTA/POTA activators

    The UV-28 offers excellent value and a high channel count for field use.

    UV-28
  • Operators needing rugged outdoor reliability

    The IP67 rating ensures the radio can withstand harsh weather and rough environments.

    HA1UV
  • Emergency preparedness and ARES/RACES use

    Its focus on emergency deployment and high channel count is perfect for coordination.

    UV-28
  • Advanced users needing deep configuration

    The high channel memory and GPS feature give it flexibility for complex operations.

    UV-28

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-28

  • 16% cheaper ($58.99 vs $69.99)
  • 4x more memory channels (1,000 vs 256)
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has Bluetooth
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Retevis HA1UV

  • 27% more battery (2800 mAh vs 2200 mAh)
  • 23g lighter (337g vs 360g)
  • IP67 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-28SpecRetevis HA1UV
$58.99
Price
$69.99
75
Overall Score
59
+27% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
—
1000
Memory Channels
256
3.8× difference
360g
Weight
337g
+6% difference
2200 mAh
Battery
2800 mAh
+27% for winner
Color LCD
Display
Color LCD
—
IP Rating
IP67
On file, scope unconfirmed
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Black
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Black
UHF VHF
Tuner Type
U/V band
UV-28 Plus
Model Number
HA1UV
1 x Headset, 1 x Belt Clip, 1 x Wrist Strap, 1 x High-Gain ANT, 1 x Speaker Mic, 1 x UV-28 PLUS Ham Radio, 2 x 2200mAh Li-ion Battery, 1 x Desktop Charger with Adapter
Built-In Media
1 x 2800mAh lithium_ion battery, 1 x Belt clip & Hand strap, 1 x Data cable, 1 x HA1UV two way radio, 1 x Type-C charging cable & Charging base
UHF VHF
Frequency Range
U/V band
QYWBAUVEBPSB21
Mfr Part Number
FA9244B-J9131P-C9034A
Repeater, Smartphone
Compatible Devices
Repeater, Speaker, two way radio with the same frequency and the same CTCSS/DCS
CHIRP Compatible, Digital Display, GPS, Long Range, Wireless APP Programmable
Additional Features
Handheld Ham Radio with Cable;IP67 waterproof;NOAA Weather Receiver;Type-C Rechargeable;VFO
18 Months Warranty & Lifetime Support
Warranty Description
We provide 2 year warranty and 30 days no reason to return;2 year warranty for radio body and 1 year warranty for accessories. Beyond the warranty period: We still offer maintain service, buyers are required to afford corresponding costs. We processed in the most hassle-free way possible.You just need to contact with us on Amazon ,we will reply you within 12 hours

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-28PICK

$58.99 on Amazon

Retevis HA1UV

$69.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons