Baofeng UV-28 vs Radtel RT-950 PRO

The UV-28 offers better listed specifications for the money, scoring 75 versus 77 overall. However, the RT-950 PRO's two-point advantage reflects a much larger sample of owner feedback: 371 reviews versus 44. Both radios receive identical 4.1 out of 5 owner ratings, meaning buyers report comparable satisfaction despite their different feature sets.

The single most important difference is power output. The UV-28 delivers 10 watts while the RT-950 PRO outputs only 4 watts, a significant advantage for range and reliable communication. The UV-28 also includes CHIRP support for easier programming and costs $48 less. The RT-950 PRO counters with APRS capability, which the UV-28 lacks, plus GPS on both units.

The UV-28 makes sense for budget-conscious operators who prioritize transmission power and don't need APRS tracking. The RT-950 PRO suits those who want APRS functionality and value the confidence of a larger owner review base, accepting lower power as a tradeoff.

Choose the UV-28 for straightforward performance at a lower price. Choose the RT-950 PRO if APRS matters to your operation and you want broader user feedback informing your purchase.