Baofeng UV-28 vs Radtel RT-950 PRO

The Radtel RT-950 PRO is the clear winner here. While the Baofeng UV-28 tempts with its lower price, the RT-950 PRO's superior overall score of 75 versus 54 reflects meaningful advantages that justify the additional $32 investment.

The single most important differentiator is APRS capability. The RT-950 PRO includes APRS functionality while the UV-28 lacks it entirely. For digital communications and location tracking, this is a significant feature gap that positions these radios for different use cases.

The Baofeng UV-28 suits budget-conscious operators who need basic analog VHF/UHF operation and GPS mapping without digital modes. The Radtel RT-950 PRO is better for users wanting modern features like APRS positioning, higher transmit power at 4 watts, and overall greater capability in a compact package.

Buy the RT-950 PRO. Its higher score, added features, and superior build quality make it the better long-term investment despite the higher price. The UV-28 saves money but delivers a noticeably less capable radio. For most operators, the RT-950 PRO's advantages outweigh the cost difference.