Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Baofeng UV-26 vs Radtel RT-910B

Our pick

Radtel RT-910B$30.99

The Radtel RT-910B is the stronger choice here. The UV-26 scores higher on owner ratings (4.4 versus 3.9 out of 5 across different review samples), but the RT-910B's known price of $31 combined with its higher overall score of 59 versus 49 makes it the better value proposition. The RT-910B also offers CHIRP compatibility for easier programming and Bluetooth capability, features the UV-26 lacks. The UV-26's 10-watt transmit power is listed, but we don't have the RT-910B's TX power, so direct comparison there isn't possible. We also lack pricing for the UV-26, which prevents a full cost analysis.

The single most important differentiator is that the RT-910B is an identified, concrete purchase at $31, while the UV-26 remains priced unknown and scores notably lower on RadioRanked's composite methodology.

The RT-910B suits buyers seeking an affordable entry point with modern conveniences like Bluetooth and programmable support. The UV-26 might appeal to those specifically prioritizing owner feedback over technical features, though the UV-26's missing price data limits its practical recommendation.

Get the Radtel RT-910B unless you have specific reasons to prioritize the UV-26's higher owner rating or its 10-watt power output.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • New licensee starting out and learning

    Bluetooth and CHIRP support make programming and learning the radio easier for a newcomer.

    RT-910B
  • Emergency preparedness kit on a budget

    Its 10-watt output and 1.25m coverage make it a sound choice for preparedness kits.

    Baofeng UV-26
  • Primary field rig for emergency communications

    Its 10-watt output suits primary field use, while the other radio is better as a spare.

    Baofeng UV-26
  • Clubs managing many networks and channel lists

    With 960 channels and CHIRP support, it handles large channel lists for multi-network club use.

    RT-910B
  • Operators wanting a 1.25m band radio

    The UV-26 covers 1.25m alongside VHF and UHF, which the other radio does not offer.

    Baofeng UV-26

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-26

  • 4% more memory channels (999 vs 960)
  • 67% more battery (2500 mAh vs 1500 mAh)
  • Has color TFT display
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-910B

  • Has Bluetooth
  • Has CHIRP compatibility

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-26SpecRadtel RT-910B
—
Price
$30.99
49
Overall Score
59
+20% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
—
999
Memory Channels
960
+4% for winner
—
Weight
280g
2500 mAh
Battery
1500 mAh
+67% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
—
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
UV26-10Watt-1Pack
color
Standard
2
unitCount
1
UV26-10Watt-1Pack
Color
Standard
VHF/1.25M/UHF
Tuner Type
UHF/VHF
UV26
Model Number
RT-910B
①1X UV26 Ham Radio, ②1X 6.1" antenna, ③1X 15.12" 771 antenna, ④1X 10.63" 771 Air-band antenna, ⑤1X 2500mAh Battery, ⑥1X Type-C charger with cable, ⑦1X earpiece with mic, ⑧1X belt, ⑨1X hand strap, ⑩1X charging base station, 10WHTC, 2500mAh Battery, 10WHTC Charger, USB Cable
Built-In Media
1x RT-910B Main unit, 1x 1500mAh Li-ion Battery,1x Dual band antenna,1x Belt Clip, 1x Type C charging Cable,1x Power supple with USB port,1x English User Manual
UV26
Mfr Part Number
1 Pack
BAOFENG UV26 Ham Radios, other devices on the same frequency bands and channels, CHIRP, CPS, TIDRADIO wireless programmer, earpiece, belt, hand strap, charging base station
Compatible Devices
Bluetooth-enabled devices, other two-way radios on 144-148Mhz/420-450Mhz frequencies
771 Antenna, Air-band antenna, Superior grip, Enhanced design, Wider frequency band, 10W power, USB C charging, 1.77inch colour screen, Frequency copy
Additional Features
Bluetooth Programmable, Type-c,AM/FM Reception,Spectrum, VOX Hands Free Handheld Radio
Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Not Water Resistant

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-26

Search on Amazon

Radtel RT-910BPICK

$30.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons