Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng UV-26 vs Radtel RT-880

Our pick

Baofeng UV-26$28.21

The Baofeng UV-26 is the clear winner here. For a radio at this price point, you're getting substantially better value with the UV-26's lower cost, known 10W output power, and higher overall score of 71 versus 52. The most important differentiator is the combination of price and transparency: the UV-26 costs $47 less while providing documented specifications, whereas the RT-880 leaves critical details like TX power unknown and lacks CHIRP compatibility, which matters significantly for programming flexibility.

The UV-26 should appeal to budget-conscious hobbyists or beginners who want a reliable entry-level handheld without surprises. The RT-880 might only interest someone who has specific compatibility needs with existing equipment or networks, though the missing power specification is concerning and should be clarified before purchase.

Our recommendation is straightforward: get the Baofeng UV-26. It delivers better specs, better pricing, and better support ecosystem at nearly a third of the RT-880's cost. Unless you have a compelling reason to choose the Radtel, the UV-26 is the more practical choice for virtually any amateur radio operator.

Runner-up
Radtel RT-880

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • First-time licensed amateur radio operator

    Its simple interface and beginner-friendly design make starting easy and affordable.

    Baofeng UV-26
  • Experienced ham needing high channel count

    The larger memory capacity offers more flexibility for covering multiple regions.

    RT-880
  • Budget-conscious emergency preparedness user

    It provides excellent core functionality at a very low price point for emergencies.

    Baofeng UV-26
  • Operator needing VHF/UHF/1.25m coverage

    The UV-26 supports the necessary multi-band operation for diverse field use.

    Baofeng UV-26
  • Technician-class operator covering multiple regions

    The higher channel count and multi-band focus suit advanced operational needs.

    RT-880

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-26

  • 62% cheaper ($28.21 vs $74.00)
  • 4% more battery (2500 mAh vs 2400 mAh)
  • Has CHIRP compatibility
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-880

  • 3% more memory channels (1,024 vs 999)

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-26SpecRadtel RT-880
$28.21
Price
$74.00
71
Overall Score
52
+37% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
999
Memory Channels
1024
+2% for winner
2500 mAh
Battery
2400 mAh
+4% for winner
1.77in TFT Color
Display
TFT Color
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
UV26-10Watt-1Pack
color
Standard
2
unitCount
1
UV26-10Watt-1Pack
Color
Standard
VHF/1.25M/UHF
Tuner Type
AM/FM/SSB
UV26
Model Number
RT-880
①1X UV26 Ham Radio, ②1X 6.1" antenna, ③1X 15.12" 771 antenna, ④1X 10.63" 771 Air-band antenna, ⑤1X 2500mAh Battery, ⑥1X Type-C charger with cable, ⑦1X earpiece with mic, ⑧1X belt, ⑨1X hand strap, ⑩1X charging base station, 10WHTC, 2500mAh Battery, 10WHTC Charger, USB Cable
Built-In Media
1x RT-880 Main unit, 1x 2400mAh Li-ion Battery,1x Dual band antenna,1x Belt Clip, 1x Type C charging Cable,1x Power supple with USB port,1x English User Manual
UV26
Mfr Part Number
Programming Cable
BAOFENG UV26 Ham Radios, other devices on the same frequency bands and channels, CHIRP, CPS, TIDRADIO wireless programmer, earpiece, belt, hand strap, charging base station
Compatible Devices
Two-way radios, headsets, earpieces, external antennas, operating on UHF, VHF, AM, FM, USB, LSB, CW, CB, LW, MW, SW, and SSB frequencies and modes
771 Antenna, Air-band antenna, Superior grip, Enhanced design, Wider frequency band, 10W power, USB C charging, 1.77inch colour screen, Frequency copy
Additional Features
AM USB LSB CW CB LW MW SW SSB Reception, 1024 Channels,Cross Band Repeater Function
Water Resistant
Water Resistance Level
Not Water Resistant

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-26PICK

$28.21 on Amazon

Radtel RT-880

$74.00 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons