Baofeng UV-25 vs Retevis A3

The UV-25 is the clear winner for most users.

The most important differentiator is the TX power specification. The UV-25 delivers 10W, while the A3's transmit power is unlisted. This missing data leaves the A3 at a disadvantage since power output is fundamental to radio capability. The UV-25 also includes GPS, CHIRP support, and a higher owner rating of 4.3/5 from 89 reviews versus the A3's 3.6/5 from 31 reviews. Owners report more satisfaction with the UV-25 across a larger sample. The A3 is lighter at 286g versus 408g, but this modest weight difference rarely justifies sacrificing power and features.

The UV-25 should be your choice if you need confirmed TX power, GPS capability, and CHIRP programmability with stronger owner feedback. The A3 might appeal only to weight-conscious users who need a bare-bones radio and don't mind the unknown TX power specification, though the lower owner rating raises questions.

Buy the UV-25. It has better specifications where we have data, works with CHIRP, includes GPS, costs less (though the A3's exact price is known), and owners report notably better satisfaction. The A3's advantages don't outweigh these gaps.