Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Aug 2026

Baofeng UV-25 vs Radtel RT-470X

Our pick

Baofeng UV-25$54.39

The Baofeng UV-25 is the clear winner for most users. While the Radtel RT-470X undercuts it by half the price, the UV-25 justifies its cost with superior performance metrics and features.

The single most important differentiator is the UV-25's confirmed 10-watt transmission power paired with GPS functionality. The RT-470X's power output remains unspecified, which is a red flag for a radio in this category. GPS capability alone adds significant utility for emergency situations and location tracking, features entirely absent from the Radtel.

Both radios support CHIRP programming, which is essential for modern amateur radio operation, but the UV-25's overall score of 76 versus 65 reflects meaningful real-world advantages. The five-year-old UV-25 remains a more mature, better-documented platform with stronger community support.

Budget-conscious beginners willing to accept unknown specifications and lower performance might consider the RT-470X as an entry point. Anyone else should buy the Baofeng UV-25.

Our final recommendation: the Baofeng UV-25 delivers better value despite higher upfront cost. Its transparency in specs, proven reliability, and inclusion of GPS make it worth the additional investment for serious amateur radio operators.

Winner
Baofeng UV-25
Runner-up
Radtel RT-470X

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Beginner needing basic local simplex communication

    Its lower price point and simpler feature set make it ideal for starting out.

    RT-470X
  • Intermediate operator needing APRS and GPS features

    The UV-25 offers superior features like GPS and higher channel capacity for advanced use.

    UV-25
  • Budget-conscious hobbyist focusing on local receiving

    The Radtel is significantly cheaper, providing enough functionality for casual local operations.

    RT-470X
  • Experienced operator needing high channel count and power

    The UV-25's 999 channels and 10W power output are better suited for serious field work.

    UV-25
  • Prepper or emergency communications backup radio

    Its robust features and higher power make it a more reliable choice for emergency scenarios.

    UV-25

Reasons to choose Baofeng UV-25

  • 4x more memory channels (999 vs 256)
  • 86% more battery (5200 mAh vs 2800 mAh)
  • Has built-in GPS
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-470X

  • 39% cheaper ($32.99 vs $54.39)
  • IP54 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng UV-25SpecRadtel RT-470X
$54.39
Price
$32.99
76
Overall Score
66
+15% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
999
Memory Channels
256
3.8× difference
5200 mAh
Battery
2800 mAh
+85% for winner
Color LCD
Display
1.77in TFT Color
IP Rating
IP54
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
Black
color
Standard
1
unitCount
1
Black
Color
Standard
UHF VHF
Tuner Type
FM/AM
14.4 ounces
Item Weight
448 Grams
UV-25 Plus
Model Number
RT-470X
5200mAh Li-ion Battery x 1, Type-C Charging Cable x 1, Adapter x 1, Gooseneck ANT x 1, High-Gain ANT x 1, Radio Pouch x 1, Belt Clip x 1, Wrist Strap x 1, Speaker Mic x 1, Headset x 1, UV-25 Plus Radio x 1
Built-In Media
1x Radtel RT-470X Ham Radio,1x 2800mAh Type-C Battery, 1x 7.87-inch Dual Band 145/435 Antenna, 1x 39-inch USB-C Charger Cable, 1x Belt Clip with Metal Piece, 1x English User Manual,1x AC Power Adapter with USB Port (FCC ID: 2AZSA-RT470X)
UHF VHF 1.25M
Frequency Range
144-148/420-450Mhz
Repeater
Compatible Devices
K-connector
2" Digital Display, GPS, Long Range, Rechargable with USB-C Port, Voice Operated Transmission
Additional Features
Air band RX, Chirp Programming, Multi-band TX/RX, Type-C Charger, Wireless Copy frequency
18 Months Warranty & Lifetime Support
Warranty Description
1 Year Warranty
5.91"D x 1.97"W x 2.76"H
Item Dimensions D x W x H
1.57"D x 2.28"W x 4.6"H

Made your choice?

Baofeng UV-25PICK

$54.39 on Amazon

Radtel RT-470X

$32.99 on Amazon

Keep researching

Related Buying Guides

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons