Baofeng UV-25 vs Baofeng UV-28

The Baofeng UV-25 is the clear winner here. Despite costing just three dollars more, it delivers significantly better overall performance with a substantially higher score of 76 versus 54.

The single most important differentiator is CHIRP compatibility. The UV-25 supports CHIRP programming software, making frequency management and configuration far easier for most users. The UV-28's lack of this support is a serious limitation that forces manual programming through the radio's interface. Additionally, the UV-25 provides confirmed 10-watt transmission power, while the UV-28's power output remains unspecified, creating uncertainty about its actual capabilities.

The UV-25 suits operators who want straightforward programming, reliable specs, and don't mind spending minimal extra money for measurably better functionality. The UV-28 is only worth considering if you absolutely cannot spend fifty dollars and accept the programming inconvenience and power ambiguity.

For most amateur radio users, the UV-25 is the obvious choice. Its CHIRP support alone justifies the minimal price difference, and the higher overall score reflects better reliability and usability across the board. Save yourself the frustration and go with the UV-25.