Skip to main content

RadioRanked verdict

Updated Nov 2026

Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRS vs Radtel RT-493

Our pick

Radtel RT-493$32.99

The Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRS is the clear winner for most users. While both radios deliver identical TX power at 10 watts, the DM-32UV justifies its $27 price premium through significantly superior features and proven performance. The single most important differentiator is the DM-32UV's digital mode support: DMR capability enables access to expanding digital networks, while integrated GPS and APRS transform it into a capable emergency communication tool that the RT-493 simply cannot match. The overall score gap of 24 points reflects this substantial feature advantage.

The Radtel RT-493 makes sense only for budget-conscious operators who need basic analog FM communication and don't anticipate using digital modes, GPS tracking, or APRS functionality. The Baofeng DM-32UV is ideal for anyone serious about amateur radio, whether exploring digital networking, emergency preparedness, or location tracking during field operations.

Our recommendation: invest the extra $27 in the DM-32UV. You're not just buying more features; you're purchasing entry into modern digital amateur radio while maintaining solid analog capability. The RT-493's cost savings evaporate quickly once you realize its limitations.

By use case

Which should you buy?

  • Budget-conscious buyer wanting basic outdoor voice comms

    It costs less and covers the analog VHF and UHF calling most casual outdoor users need.

    RT-493
  • Technician-class field operator on simplex and repeater links

    Its rugged IP67 rating and light 280g body suit repeater and simplex work outdoors.

    RT-493
  • GMRS or business frequency user needing a simple radio

    It handles UHF analog use cleanly at a lower cost without needing digital features.

    RT-493
  • First-time licensee wanting to try DMR digital operation

    It supports DMR and APRS, letting a new operator explore digital modes that the Radtel cannot access.

    Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRS
  • Portable field or public service operator using APRS tracking

    Built-in GPS and APRS support give it a clear advantage for location sharing in the field.

    Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRS
  • Operator wanting maximum features on a single handheld

    It has a higher feature score and 4000 memory channels compared with the Radtel's 199.

    Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRS

Reasons to choose Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRS

  • 20x more memory channels (4,000 vs 199)
  • Has DMR digital mode
  • Has APRS support
  • Has built-in GPS
  • Has CHIRP compatibility
  • Has color TFT display
  • FCC equipment authorization on file

Reasons to choose Radtel RT-493

  • 12% more battery (2800 mAh vs 2500 mAh)
  • 70g lighter (280g vs 350g)
  • IP67 water resistance

Spec battle

Spec-by-spec breakdown

Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRSSpecRadtel RT-493
—
Price
$32.99
79
Overall Score
59
+33% for winner
10.00W
TX Power (High)
10.00W
4000
Memory Channels
199
20.0× difference
350g
Weight
280g
+25% difference
2500 mAh
Battery
2800 mAh
+12% for winner
Color LCD
Display
—
—
IP Rating
IP67
Covers the electronics only (Part 15B)
FCC Authorization
No grant found
1
unitCount
1
UHF VHF
Tuner Type
AM/FM
DM-32UV
Model Number
RT-493
2500mAh Battery x 1, Standard ANT x 1, BAOFENG DMR Radio x 1, Desktop Charger Base x 1, USB-C Charger x 1, Headset x 1, Radio Case Holder x 1
Built-In Media
1x RT-493 Radio, 1x Li-ion Battery with Type C Port, 1x Desktop Charger, 1x Antenna, 1x Belt clip, 1x Eng User manual
UHF VHF
Frequency Range
462.55 -462.725 Mhz, 462.5625 -462.7125 Mhz, 467.55 -467.725 Mhz, 467.5625-467.7125Mhz
QYWBDDMSEUV23
Mfr Part Number
RT-493
Repeater, Two Way Radio
Compatible Devices
devices, External antennas
Digital Display, Dual Band, GPS & Digital APRS, Long Range, USB-C Rechargable
Additional Features
Build-in display, IP67 Waterproof, Type-C Charging
18 Months Warranty & Lifetime Support
Warranty Description
1 Year

Made your choice?

Baofeng DM-32UV GPS APRSPICK

Search on Amazon

Radtel RT-493

$32.99 on Amazon

More head-to-heads

Related Comparisons