Baofeng DM-32 vs Retevis A3

The Baofeng DM-32 is the clear winner here. This comparison isn't particularly close given the significant gap in overall scores and feature set.

The most important differentiator is the DM-32's digital mode support. It includes DMR, APRS, and GPS functionality, making it vastly more capable for modern amateur radio operations. The A3 offers none of these features, which explains its substantially lower score of 31 versus 78. Additionally, the DM-32 delivers 10W of transmit power, while the A3's power output remains unspecified, typically indicating a weaker performer.

The DM-32 suits operators wanting a modern, capable handheld with digital capability at an entry-level price point. The A3 might appeal only to someone with an extremely tight budget who needs a basic analog-only radio, though even then the DM-32's $20 premium seems justified given the performance difference.

Buy the Baofeng DM-32. The A3 doesn't present a compelling case against it in any meaningful metric. Unless you have specific compatibility requirements with analog-only systems, the DM-32 provides better value, more capability, and superior overall performance for just a modest price difference.