Baofeng UV-32 vs Retevis RT95

The Baofeng UV-32 is the clear winner here. Despite the Retevis RT95's higher price point and CHIRP compatibility, the UV-32 delivers superior overall performance at a fraction of the cost. The most important differentiator is the UV-32's confirmed 10W transmit power and GPS capability, which the RT95 lacks entirely. The RT95's unknown power output and missing GPS functionality are significant drawbacks that justify neither its $126 price tag nor its lower 53/100 score.

The Baofeng UV-32 should appeal to budget-conscious operators who value practical features like GPS tracking and adequate transmit power for general communication. The Retevis RT95 is only worth considering if you specifically need CHIRP compatibility and have already ruled out other options with known specifications.

For most operators, the UV-32 offers better value and functionality. Buy the Baofeng unless you have a specific workflow requirement tied to CHIRP programming that makes the RT95's flexibility worth the premium. The transparent specifications and higher score on the UV-32 make it the safer choice.