Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and scores.
The Baofeng UV-25 is the clear winner here. It outperforms the Yaesu FT-65R in nearly every measurable category while costing less than half the price.
The single most important differentiator is transmit power. The UV-25 delivers 10 watts compared to the FT-65R's 5 watts, giving you double the effective range and coverage for the same frequencies. Both lack advanced features like DMR, APRS, and GPS, so that's a wash. Both support CHIRP programming, which is essential for modern operators.
The UV-25 should appeal to budget-conscious hams who want genuine performance without paying premium prices, while the FT-65R might interest those who prioritize Yaesu's brand reputation and build quality despite the performance gap and higher cost.
Our recommendation is straightforward: buy the Baofeng UV-25. You'll get superior power output, a significantly lower price tag, and a higher overall score. The $95 savings can fund additional accessories or radios for your setup. Unless you have specific loyalty to Yaesu's ecosystem or ergonomics, there's no practical reason to choose the FT-65R.
★ 4.3 (43 reviews)
★ 4.6 (461 reviews)
| Spec | Baofeng UV-25 (Green) | Yaesu FT-65R |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $63.99 | $119.00 |
| Overall Score | 62 | 57 |
| TX Power (High) | 10.00W | 5.00W |
| Memory Channels | 999 | 200 |
| Weight | — | 215g |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 1950 mAh |
| Display | LCD | LCD |
| IP Rating | — | IP54 |
| FCC Authorization | Authorized | Authorized |
| Color | green | Clear |
| Special Feature | Long Range | Uhf |
| Tuner Type | HF | UHF, VHF |
| Model Number | UV-25 PRO | FT-65R |
| Built-In Media | JIQI | 1950mAh Li-ion battery pack, 2.5-hour Rapid Charger, optional 2500mAh Li-ion battery pack, and 7.4V lithium-ion battery |
| Additional Features | Long Range | Uhf |